14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330 11. <strong>The</strong> Age-Long Recovery<br />

resurfacing, there were those who postulated a severe case <strong>of</strong> split personality;<br />

more recently we have started seeing more irreverent accounts<br />

as well. 137<br />

Newton was sharply aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> knowledge inherited<br />

from Antiquity, but his use <strong>of</strong> nonscientific sources and his ideological<br />

bent did not allow him to perceive the true origin <strong>of</strong> the relevant knowledge,<br />

namely Hellenistic science. In his view, the pr<strong>of</strong>undity <strong>of</strong> thought <strong>of</strong><br />

the “Ancients” (which struck him inordinately) arose from an early Truth<br />

preserved in the esoteric tradition <strong>of</strong> priesthoods and religious sects. Here<br />

is how the origins <strong>of</strong> heliocentrism are presented in the System <strong>of</strong> the world:<br />

It was the opinion <strong>of</strong> not a few, in the earliest age <strong>of</strong> philosophy, . . .<br />

that under the fixed stars the planets were carried about the sun; that<br />

the earth, as one <strong>of</strong> the planets, described an annual course about<br />

the sun, while by a diurnal motion it was in the meantime revolved<br />

about its own axis. . . . This was the philosophy taught <strong>of</strong> old by<br />

Philolaus, Aristarchus <strong>of</strong> Samos, Plato . . . and <strong>of</strong> that wise king <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Romans, Numa Pompilius, who, as a symbol <strong>of</strong> the figure <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

with the sun in the centre, erected a round temple in honor <strong>of</strong> Vesta,<br />

and ordained perpetual fire to be kept in the middle <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Egyptians were early observers <strong>of</strong> the heavens; and from them,<br />

probably, this philosophy was spread abroad among other nations;<br />

for from them it was, and the nations about them, that the Greeks,<br />

a people more addicted to the study <strong>of</strong> philology than <strong>of</strong> Nature,<br />

derived their first, as well as soundest, notions <strong>of</strong> philosophy; and<br />

in the Vestal ceremonies we may yet trace the ancient spirit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Egyptians; for it was their way to deliver their mysteries, that is, their<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> things above the common way <strong>of</strong> thinking, under the page 406<br />

veil <strong>of</strong> religious rites and hieroglyphic symbols. 138<br />

<strong>The</strong> superiority <strong>of</strong> the Egyptians over the Greeks, and <strong>of</strong> sacred rites and<br />

mysteries over rational research, is a topos <strong>of</strong> Hermetic literature, a genre<br />

that dates from late Hellenistic times (when native Egyptians regained<br />

137 For example, [White]. Newton’s first exegetic work on the Apocalypse <strong>of</strong> St. John, written in<br />

the 1670s, was first published in 1994, as [Newton/Mamiani]. Its very existence was little known<br />

and indeed had been concealed by Samuel Horsley, the first editor <strong>of</strong> Newton’s “complete” works<br />

(1779). <strong>The</strong> Observations on the prophecies <strong>of</strong> Daniel and the Apocalypse <strong>of</strong> St. John, written much later in<br />

Newton’s life, were published in 1733 and enjoyed several reprintings, including the recent [Newton/Barnett];<br />

they probably contributed to the false belief that Newton’s writings on religion were<br />

the product <strong>of</strong> his declining years. <strong>The</strong>re is in fact methodological continuity between Newton’s<br />

religious works and the Principia; in this regard the introduction to [Newton/Mamiani] is very<br />

worth reading.<br />

138 Newton, De mundi systemate liber, 1, anonymous/Cajori translation.<br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 07:48:20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!