14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.7 Chemistry 145<br />

andria, in connection with the same phenomenon, but in a more technical<br />

context. After observing that coal, after burning, undergoes a small change<br />

in volume but a large decrease in weight, Heron attributes the drop to the<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> coal into particles <strong>of</strong> different nature (fire, air and earth),<br />

which partly go away as smoke and partly get absorbed by the ground. 91a<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong> mass appears to be contradicted in the Pneumatics <strong>of</strong><br />

Philo <strong>of</strong> Byzantium: in the candle experiment (see page 69 and note 85<br />

thereon) the explanation given is that the air “perishes”. But a reading <strong>of</strong><br />

the homonymous work by Heron, which was preserved in the original<br />

Greek (unlike Philo’s: see page 68), suggests that this may reflect a simplification<br />

undergone by Philo’s text in the late Arabic and Latin versions<br />

that have reached us. Indeed, Heron, who certainly uses Philo as a source,<br />

repeatedly uses forms <strong>of</strong> the verb (destroy, spoil, corrupt; probably<br />

the same verb used in Philo’s original) to describe what happens to air<br />

and other substances during combustion, but he always clarifies that the<br />

corruption consists in a transformation into other substances. He says, in<br />

particular, that the air enclosed in a glass container, if consumed by the<br />

fire, is in fact leaving through pores in the glass, leaving behind empty<br />

space that attracts other matter. 91b Thus conservation <strong>of</strong> matter was regarded<br />

by Heron as so certain that its apparent violations were explained<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> invisible processes. It is highly improbable that this view was<br />

a novelty <strong>of</strong> Heron’s times, if we consider that Erasistratus, in the third<br />

century B.C., also seems to have been so confident in the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

matter as to deduce from the change in weight <strong>of</strong> an animal left in isolation<br />

the emission <strong>of</strong> invisible matter (see the description <strong>of</strong> his experiment<br />

on page 134).<br />

Some additional information about ancient chemical knowledge can be<br />

gleaned from papyri. An especially interesting case is that <strong>of</strong> the word oxos<br />

(). It is usually translated as vinegar, that being its original meaning.<br />

But recipe 14 <strong>of</strong> the Leyden papyrus talks about oxos from the purification<br />

<strong>of</strong> gold ( ¥ ). Since the methods given for purifying<br />

gold may have released hydrochloric or sulfuric acid but certainly<br />

not wine vinegar, it is clear that oxos is being used here in a sense similar<br />

to acid, a notion that must have been partly worked out by Alexandrian<br />

empirical chemists. <strong>The</strong> Latin term corresponding to oxos is acetum, also<br />

translated as vinegar. Now, Livy says that Hannibal used acetum to dissolve<br />

a blockage in a gorge. 92 This is unlikely (and Polybius says nothing page 189<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sort in his account), but it is very suggestive: Livy may have heard<br />

91a Heron, Pneumatica, I, proem = [Heron: OO], vol. I, 10, 13–24.<br />

91b Heron, Pneumatica, I, proem = [Heron: OO], vol. I, 16, 10–14.<br />

92 Livy, Ab urbe condita libri, XXI, xxxvii, 2.<br />

Revision: 1.9 Date: 2002/09/14 19:12:01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!