14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

260 10. Lost <strong>Science</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between the abstract meaning that semeion had to the page 324<br />

Greek mathematicians and the concrete notion <strong>of</strong> signum (a sign on the<br />

paper) that a Roman writer like Vitruvius may substitute for it can be important<br />

in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> passages <strong>of</strong> astronomical arguments. <strong>The</strong><br />

same Latin term signum can in fact mean a sign <strong>of</strong> the zodiac (a meaning<br />

expressed in Greek by a different word, ). In all cases the Latin term<br />

maintained a concrete meaning; <strong>of</strong> course the context would generally allow<br />

one to tell which signum was meant: for example, a sign on paper or<br />

a sign <strong>of</strong> the zodiac. But we see the problems that could arise in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Greek scientific work making a statement about a ¨ in astronomical<br />

space. A Roman reader might think that, since in Latin a signum<br />

on the sky is a zodiacal sign, the same is true <strong>of</strong> a semeion on the sky; and<br />

even if he was aware that this is not so, he would lack the linguistic tools<br />

needed to correctly translate the text into Latin. As to the association between<br />

letter and signum, since to Vitruvius it is at most a matter <strong>of</strong> spatial<br />

proximity, it cannot be easily extended to the “signs” in the sky, since there<br />

are no letters there. Since in Greek the letters <strong>of</strong> the alphabet are used also<br />

as ordinal numerals, it would be natural in this case to assume this latter<br />

meaning for the letters and to intrepret expressions such as semeion B<br />

(“point B”) as “the second sign”.<br />

Assuming that the source really did refer to the points in a geometric<br />

construction, can the diagram underlying Vitruvius’ passage be reconstructed?<br />

Note first that Vitruvius mentions triangles with equal sides (paribus lateribus).<br />

This might seem to refer to equilateral triangles, but it can equally<br />

mean an isosceles triangle, especially since the Greek adjective “isosceles”<br />

() means “equal-sided” and Vitruvius may have translated<br />

it componentwise instead <strong>of</strong> adopting the Greek word itself as became<br />

customary later. <strong>The</strong> surrounding sentence, “its rays extend out . . . using<br />

lines in the shape <strong>of</strong> a triangle with equal sides”, suggests triangles<br />

whose equal sides are formed by rays originating in the sun, and so favors<br />

the meaning “isosceles”. More than one such triangle, each sharing<br />

one ray-side with the next, would all have the same side length. Thus the page 325<br />

geometric construction might involve adjacent isosceles triangles fanning<br />

out from the sun; note that the rays <strong>of</strong> the sun (radii in Latin) are also radii<br />

<strong>of</strong> a circle, since they are all <strong>of</strong> the same length.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> alter (“alterius trigoni”) indicates that there were two triangles<br />

being considered. Thus we obtain Figure 10.1, left, where H marks the<br />

position <strong>of</strong> the Sun.<br />

<strong>The</strong> last position considered for the planet is, in Vitruvius’ words, at the<br />

fifth signum, which is a signum in the second triangle. In our interpretation,<br />

the original meaning <strong>of</strong> this statement was that the planet, at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 02:20:46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!