14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.14 <strong>The</strong> First Few Definitions in Euclid’s Elements 283<br />

Since the sentence “a point is a ‘sign’ having no parts” is very similar<br />

to Definition 1 in the Elements, and the characterization <strong>of</strong> a point as the<br />

extremity <strong>of</strong> a line coincides with Definition 3, it is generally thought that<br />

Sextus is citing Euclid in this passage. But a third property <strong>of</strong> points is<br />

mentioned, namely their extensionlessness, and further, none <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

properties is called a definition (), but rather a description. By contrast,<br />

when Sextus reports the definition <strong>of</strong> a circle (which we can probably<br />

assume to go back to Euclid, because <strong>of</strong> the testimonium from the Herculaneum<br />

papyrus), he talks instead <strong>of</strong> mathematicians defining () a<br />

circle. 209 Now, in the Elements many statements are called definitions, but<br />

nothing is called a description. This indicates that in the case <strong>of</strong> a point<br />

Sextus Empiricus is alluding not to Euclid but to someone else.<br />

What Sextus says about points is much closer to a passage from a work<br />

titled Definitions <strong>of</strong> terms in geometry, with which Heron’s name has long page 352<br />

been associated. This text, after a dedication where the author states his<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> describing the technical vocabulary <strong>of</strong> geometry, consists <strong>of</strong> a<br />

hundred or so paragraph-length sections, each illustrating and characterizing<br />

one geometric concept. Little <strong>of</strong> this material qualifies as definitions,<br />

belying the work’s traditional name. 210 <strong>The</strong> first section starts:<br />

A point is that which has no part, or an extremity without extension,<br />

or the extremity <strong>of</strong> a line. 211<br />

Thus we see here the two telltale differences present in the Sextus Empiricus<br />

passage but not in the Elements: the use <strong>of</strong> the verb “describe”<br />

() and the characterization <strong>of</strong> the point as devoid <strong>of</strong> extension.<br />

Getting back to the Sextus passage quoted on the preceding page, here SL: check if previous page<br />

or this page<br />

is how it continues:<br />

A line is a length without width or the extremity <strong>of</strong> a surface; a surface<br />

is the extremity <strong>of</strong> a body, or a width without depth.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> this appears both in the Definitions and in the Elements, except for<br />

“a surface is the extremity <strong>of</strong> a body”, which is not in the latter, showing<br />

again that Sextus was not relying on the Elements. In discussing the notion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a straight line, too, Sextus reports both the definition that appears in the<br />

209 Sextus Empiricus, Adversus mathematicos, III, 107.<br />

210 Heron’s Definitions <strong>of</strong> terms in geometry ( ) is the title<br />

it bore in the Byzantine compilation where it was preserved. Though the work is still generally<br />

attributed to Heron, Knorr gives good reasons to think that it belongs to Diophantus ([Knorr: AS]).<br />

It first appeared in print in 1570 as an adjunct to Dasypodius’ edition <strong>of</strong> Book I <strong>of</strong> the Elements; our<br />

references are to Heiberg’s edition in [Heron: OO], vol. IV.<br />

211 ¨ (Heronis Definitiones, 14,<br />

11–12, ed. Heiberg).<br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 02:20:46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!