14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.7 Chemistry 141<br />

specific characteristics is suggested by his mention <strong>of</strong> primitive men who<br />

had a distinct bone structure and no language. 72<br />

As we shall see, the early Hellenistic period witnessed the first direct<br />

contributions from learned men to agricultural techniques. <strong>The</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

plants was also important to pharmacology, which became the main application<br />

<strong>of</strong> botanics in the imperial age. <strong>The</strong> best source on this matter is<br />

the De materia medica, compiled in the first century A.D. by the physician<br />

Dioscorides. Down to the modern era it continued to be the best surviving<br />

treatise on the medicinal properties <strong>of</strong> plants.<br />

5.7 Chemistry<br />

Chemical studies started in the Hellenistic period. Such early studies are<br />

usually thought <strong>of</strong> as “alchemical”, but what is properly called alchemy —<br />

a syncretism <strong>of</strong> Greek natural philosophy, Egyptian magic, allusions to<br />

Judaism and Christianity, craftsmen’s recipes and empirical chemistry —<br />

is first documented in the writings <strong>of</strong> Zosimus <strong>of</strong> Panopolis, from the early<br />

fourth century <strong>of</strong> our era: 73 a time when all areas <strong>of</strong> Hellenistic science had<br />

already been overrun by irrationalist currents.<br />

Very little remains <strong>of</strong> early chemical works. One reason is hinted at by page 184<br />

Zosimus himself, who insists on the arcane character <strong>of</strong> the knowledge<br />

he is passing on. 74 He and his “alchemist” successors call theirs the sacred<br />

art ( ) and refer explicitly to ancient Egyptian religious centers,<br />

above all Memphis, as the birthplace <strong>of</strong> chemical lore. One imagines<br />

that from its beginnings Egyptian chemistry was controlled by the priestly<br />

class, 75 which as late as the Ptolemaic era was in charge <strong>of</strong> many economic<br />

activities, carried out in temples. 76 Our attempts at reconstructing<br />

Hellenistic empirical chemistry are thus thwarted by its confluence with<br />

alchemy in later centuries, and we must be content with glimpses <strong>of</strong> it<br />

caught through the alchemists who, deciding what to transmit and how<br />

it would be combined with ingredients from other sources, filtered that<br />

knowledge.<br />

72 Lucretius, De rerum natura, V, 925–928, 1028–1032.<br />

73 [Zosimus/Mertens] is a recent critical edition <strong>of</strong> this author’s Authentic memoirs, <strong>of</strong> which thirteen<br />

fragments exist. For his other writings one must use [CAAG], dating from 1888 and unsatisfactory<br />

in various respects.<br />

74 Zosimus, Authentic memoirs, IV, 1, 30–34; VII, 2, 8–10; X, 7, 135–137 (ed. Mertens).<br />

75 On the relationship between ancient “alchemical” knowledge and the Egyptian priesthood<br />

(especially the Memphis sanctuary), see Mertens’ complementary note 9 in [Zosimus/Mertens],<br />

pp. 187–189 and references therein.<br />

76 See page 230.<br />

Revision: 1.9 Date: 2002/09/14 19:12:01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!