14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4 Hydrostatics 65<br />

ers more intuitive. Archimedes’ exposition is <strong>of</strong> great interest for several<br />

reasons: the great intellectual honesty <strong>of</strong> a man who tries to communicate<br />

not only the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> his results but also the mental route through which<br />

they were identified; the importance he gives to what we might call physical<br />

intuition; the illustration <strong>of</strong> how important it is, even for a genius such<br />

as Archimedes, to use familiar methods in finding new scientific results<br />

(though the “objective” connection between these methods and the initial<br />

problem seems tenuous later).<br />

Many widespread ideas about the relationship between mathematics<br />

and physics should perhaps be revised in the light <strong>of</strong> the realization that<br />

the original pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the now familiar formula for the volume <strong>of</strong> a sphere<br />

was in fact one <strong>of</strong> the first results <strong>of</strong> mechanics.<br />

3.4 Hydrostatics<br />

As far as we know, scientific hydrostatics was born with the work On floating<br />

bodies, by Archimedes. And it was born already with much the same<br />

form it has today. Indeed, Archimedes makes it a scientific theory by laying<br />

its foundation in the form <strong>of</strong> a postulate:<br />

If contiguous portions <strong>of</strong> liquid lie at the same level, the portion that<br />

is more compressed pushes away the portion that is less compressed.<br />

Each portion is compressed by the weight <strong>of</strong> liquid that lies vertically<br />

above it, as long as the liquid is not enclosed in something and compressed<br />

by something else. 69<br />

<strong>The</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> the postulate has generally been misunderstood, both<br />

because a key word was twisted in the Latin translation that was until<br />

1906 the only accessible version, and because Archimedes never uses the<br />

statement in this one surviving work, which deals with bodies that float<br />

on an open liquid. But note that the so-called principle <strong>of</strong> communicating<br />

vessels (though also not deduced explicitly in this work) clearly follows<br />

from the postulate, and may even have suggested its formulation. 70<br />

As a theorem arising from this postulate, Archimedes derives the famous<br />

principle that bears his name and that we all learn in school: Any<br />

69 Archimedes, On floating bodies, I, 6 (ed. Mugler, vol. III).<br />

70 If two open vessels joined by a horizontal tube are in equilibrium, portions <strong>of</strong> liquid lying at<br />

the same level are under the same pressure, whether they be contiguous (by the first part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

postulate and the assumption <strong>of</strong> equilibrium) or not (by transitivity). Now consider a portion <strong>of</strong><br />

liquid in each container, both portions being at the same level and not compressed by anything else,<br />

only by the liquid above them: the equality <strong>of</strong> pressures just derived implies (by the second part <strong>of</strong><br />

the postulate) that the columns <strong>of</strong> liquid above these two portions are equal. <strong>The</strong>refore the surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> the liquid is at the same level in both containers.<br />

Revision: 1.13 Date: 2002/10/16 19:04:00<br />

page 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!