14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.2 <strong>The</strong> Renaissance 301<br />

tic works that survived down to the Renaissance still exist today, or that<br />

those that exist have all been published or are even necessarily known.<br />

An annotation by Leonardo in Codex L <strong>of</strong> the Institut de France contains<br />

the sentence “You will get through Borges the Archimedes from the bishop<br />

<strong>of</strong> Padua and through Vitellozzo the one from the village at San Sepolcro.”<br />

43 Some <strong>of</strong> Leonardo’s sources on Archimedes must have contained<br />

information now lost: for instance, he describes and draws an otherwise<br />

unknown steam cannon (the architronito, or “mega-thunder”), crediting it<br />

to Archimedes, 44 and he knows biographical details concerning a stay <strong>of</strong><br />

Archimedes in Spain 45 and concerning his tomb 46 <strong>of</strong> which we have no<br />

other record.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is more in Leonardo’s manuscripts that seems to be based on now<br />

vanished sources. It would be nice to find out, for example, where he read<br />

about the magnification <strong>of</strong> faraway objects and the possibility <strong>of</strong> building<br />

an instrument that could be used to study the features <strong>of</strong> the moon’s sur- page 372<br />

face. 47 Perhaps his source was the same that allowed Girolamo Fracastoro,<br />

a bit later (1538), to be more specific and say that this is done with two<br />

lenses, not least because Fracastoro too (a physician, poet and humanist)<br />

talks about using the instrument to observe the moon. 48 What is certain is<br />

that neither author was able to describe in detail, and much less build, the<br />

telescopes <strong>of</strong> which they write.<br />

Mechanical technology, too, continued to move forward in the sixteenth<br />

century, with the building for amusement <strong>of</strong> various self-propelled mechanisms<br />

(which gave rise to such things as clocks with jackwork) and the<br />

reproduction <strong>of</strong> ancient devices, like the differential gear, which were to<br />

be <strong>of</strong> great importance to productive technology. 49<br />

43 Codex L <strong>of</strong> the Institut de France, 2a = [Leonardo/Richter], vol. II, p. 428.<br />

44 <strong>The</strong> passage is quoted by Gille, who adds: “Such experiments . . . led Leonardo to conceive<br />

the war engine he called the architonitro, whose paternity he attributes to Archimedes, for reasons<br />

not too clear. It seems this was simply the same as the famous seventeenth-century experiment <strong>of</strong><br />

making a cannon shoot by filling it with water and heating” ([Gille: IR], p. 179).<br />

45 Codex Ashburnham 2037 (ex codex B), 12 b = [Leonardo/Richter], vol. II, p. 451. Trips <strong>of</strong> Archimedes<br />

after his return from Egypt, not known from any ancient source presently available, are also<br />

mentioned by Torelli in his biography <strong>of</strong> the scientist at the beginning <strong>of</strong> [Archimedes/Torelli].<br />

46 Codex Arundel (British Museum), 279 b = [Leonardo/Richter], vol. II, p. 446.<br />

47 Codex E <strong>of</strong> the Istitut de France, 15b = [Leonardo/Richter], vol. II, pp. 140–141.<br />

48 “Per dua specilla ocularia si quis perspiciat, alteri altero superposito, maiora multo et propinquiora<br />

videbit omnia” (G. Fracastoro, Homocentrica sive de stellis, II, viii); the reference to the moon<br />

is in III, xxiii. This is the book where the author puts forth Eudoxus <strong>of</strong> Cnidus’ theory <strong>of</strong> concentric<br />

spheres.<br />

49 <strong>The</strong> first application <strong>of</strong> differential gears in production (to a threading machine) came centuries<br />

after the introduction <strong>of</strong> the same mechanism in astronomical clocks. Any doubt that it was an independent<br />

reinvention rather than the resumption <strong>of</strong> Hellenistic knowledge disappears when we<br />

observe that in sixteenth-century astronomical clocks differential gears were employed to transform<br />

synodic months into sidereal months, the exact same use to which they were put in the<br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 07:48:20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!