14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

334 11. <strong>The</strong> Age-Long Recovery<br />

We can therefore conjecture that in his scientific source there was a quantitative<br />

statement, expressed through an equality <strong>of</strong> ratios, linking the<br />

force exerted by the sun with the spread <strong>of</strong> heat. It is possible that the<br />

source stated that the force decreases with distance in the same ratio as<br />

the intensity <strong>of</strong> light and heat, and thus in inverse proportion to the area<br />

reached: the same idea later stated by Roger Bacon, Kepler and Boulliau.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two-dimensional context <strong>of</strong> Vitruvius’ work matches particular well<br />

Kepler’s treatment (which, as we have already seen, appears to almost<br />

quote verbatim from Vitruvius in this matter <strong>of</strong> the force exerted by the<br />

sun).<br />

Of course, the interpretation we have suggested for Vitruvius’ passage<br />

is only one possibility. Boulliau might have taken his ideas from some<br />

other classical author or from medieval authors, such as Roger Bacon.<br />

However, in the absence <strong>of</strong> ancient sources, direct or indirect, it is unlikely<br />

that either he or Bacon would have examined the variation with distance<br />

in a “force” whose meaning they did not know yet.<br />

Misunderstanding for reflections on nature what were in fact attempts<br />

to interpret ancient texts may have led astray many historians who have<br />

sought to trace the development <strong>of</strong> ideas in the dawn <strong>of</strong> “modern science”.<br />

11.8 <strong>The</strong> Rift Between Mathematics and Physics<br />

<strong>The</strong> terminology <strong>of</strong> Renaissance scientists still followed the Greek model.<br />

“Mathematics” meant the exact sciences as a whole. 149 When Copernicus<br />

proudly wrote, in the dedicatory letter <strong>of</strong> the De revolutionibus, that “math- page 410<br />

ematics is for mathematicians” (mathemata mathematicis scribuntur), he had<br />

no doubt that his theory <strong>of</strong> the solar system was part <strong>of</strong> math.<br />

As an example <strong>of</strong> what was still understood by the word in the early<br />

seventeenth century, consider the second postulate in Simon Stevin’s On<br />

the theory <strong>of</strong> ebb and flow (<strong>of</strong> tides):<br />

[We postulate] that the earth is entirely covered with water, without<br />

the wind or anything else hindering the ebb and flow. 150<br />

148 This section contains material drawn from [Russo: Appunti].<br />

149 In fact, the Renaissance’s extraordinary cultural unity caused the term to acquire an even wider<br />

meaning for some authors. Fra Luca Pacioli, in the front page <strong>of</strong> his famous De divina proportione<br />

(1509), addresses it to “every student <strong>of</strong> philosophy, perspective, painting, sculpture, architecture,<br />

music and other mathematics”.<br />

150 Simon Stevin, Van de spiegheling der ebbenvloet (Leiden, 1608), p. 179 = [Stevin: PW], p. 333. <strong>The</strong><br />

work is methodologically very interesting, but no more than middling in its technical content: it<br />

lays out a simple static model for tides, based on lunar effects alone, and does not even discuss the<br />

correlation between tides and phases <strong>of</strong> the moon.<br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 07:48:20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!