14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 5. Medicine and Other Empirical <strong>Science</strong>s<br />

the difficulty. <strong>The</strong> passage was well known to modern scientists 58 and its<br />

influence has probably been underestimated by historians <strong>of</strong> science.<br />

Strabo (who on this subject reports also fragments <strong>of</strong> Posidonius 59 ) says<br />

that Eratosthenes studied the transformations <strong>of</strong> the earth’s crust and that<br />

he <strong>of</strong>fered as pro<strong>of</strong> that coastlines had moved in the deep past the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> marine fossil deposits on land. 60 <strong>The</strong> argument actually goes back<br />

to Xenophanes (sixth century B.C.), who noticed the presence <strong>of</strong> shells and<br />

indications <strong>of</strong> fishing in areas that lay inland in his time. 60a Among the<br />

marine fossils known in ancient Egypt were the ammonites, so named in<br />

Antiquity because <strong>of</strong> their spiral form, similar to the ram-horns sported<br />

by the <strong>The</strong>ban god Ammon. Historians <strong>of</strong> paleontology have long maintained<br />

that the Ancients, though occasionally stumbling on large vertebrate<br />

fossils, ignored them because <strong>of</strong> a prejudice rooted in the belief in<br />

the fixity <strong>of</strong> species. But in a recent work, Adrienne Mayor has shown<br />

that it is rather a matter <strong>of</strong> historiographical prejudice preventing modern<br />

scholars from taking seriously the ample available textual evidence<br />

on ancient fossil finds. 61 She used the sources to demonstrate that:<br />

– From the archaic period on there was a lot <strong>of</strong> interest in the frequent<br />

finds <strong>of</strong> fossils <strong>of</strong> large vertebrates, which were <strong>of</strong>ten kept in temples as<br />

precious relics because they were interpreted as remainders <strong>of</strong> giants<br />

or heroes. Several authors <strong>of</strong> classical or late Antiquity associated the<br />

buried finds <strong>of</strong> enormous bones with the events <strong>of</strong> the gigantomachia:<br />

a myth toward which the fossils themselves probably contributed.<br />

– Starting from at least the fifth century B.C. some fossils were identified<br />

as belonging to animal species no longer extant.<br />

– George Cuvier, the founder <strong>of</strong> modern paleontology, unlike some <strong>of</strong><br />

his successors, knew the ancient prodromes <strong>of</strong> his discipline: he collected<br />

testimonia on ancient discoveries and descriptions <strong>of</strong> fossils dating<br />

from the fifth century B.C. to the fifth century A.D. 61a<br />

Unfortunately, as usual, we have not a single Hellenistic work about the<br />

subject. But <strong>The</strong>ophrastus wrote two books On petrification ( <br />

), which very likely dealt with fossilization. 61b <strong>The</strong> same interest<br />

58 For example, Darwin cites it in the preface to <strong>The</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> species, adding: “We here see the<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> natural selection shadowed forth. . . ” ([Darwin], preface, footnote 1).<br />

59 Strabo, Geography, II, iii, 6.<br />

60 Strabo, Geography, I, iii, 4.<br />

60a Hippolytus, Refutatio contra omnes haereses, I, 14, 5 = [DG], 566.<br />

61 [Mayor]. <strong>The</strong>re is no lack <strong>of</strong> texts espousing the point <strong>of</strong> view Mayor contradicts; having the<br />

luxury <strong>of</strong> the choice, she mentions [Rudwick] and [Horner, Dobb], among others.<br />

61a [Cuvier].<br />

61b We know the title <strong>of</strong> the work from Diogenes Laertius (V, 42). That it dealt with fossilization<br />

is suggested by <strong>The</strong>ophrastus’ mention <strong>of</strong> “fossil ivory” ( ; De lapidibus, 37) and<br />

Revision: 1.9 Date: 2002/09/14 19:12:01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!