14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.7 Chemistry 143<br />

We shall see that in Hellenistic times there developed also other industries<br />

involving the transformation <strong>of</strong> matter, from metal extraction and<br />

refining to the manufacture <strong>of</strong> cosmetics, fragrances and medicines. 83<br />

Already the Stoics, and particularly Chrysippus, in the third century page 186<br />

B.C., had clearly in mind the distinction between heterogeneous materials,<br />

homogeneous mixtures and single compounds. We know this from<br />

various sources. Stobaeus, for instance, writes:<br />

Stoics like to distinguish between juxtaposition (©), mixture<br />

(), blend (©) and composition (©) . . . A mixture is<br />

the complete interpenetration <strong>of</strong> two or more bodies, preserving the<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> each . . . A blend, according to them, is the complete<br />

interpenetration <strong>of</strong> two or more liquids, preserving the properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> each. A blend displays simultaneously the properties <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />

the blended liquids, such as wine, honey, water, vinegar and so on.<br />

That in such blends the properties <strong>of</strong> the constituents are preserved<br />

is clearly shown by the fact that one can generally separate them<br />

again with the right trick. If a sponge dipped in oil is introduced in<br />

a blend <strong>of</strong> water and wine, the water will be attracted to the sponge<br />

and separated from the wine. <strong>The</strong> composition (©) <strong>of</strong> two or<br />

more qualities is instead a transformation () <strong>of</strong> the bodies<br />

that gives rise to qualities diverse from the original ones, as happens<br />

in the synthesis (©) <strong>of</strong> perfumes or medicines. 84<br />

It is worth remarking that the noun we have translated as composition<br />

(©) never appears in Aristotle’s works, 85 and that the concept<br />

it designates is illustrated here with examples from the new mattertransformation<br />

industries. <strong>The</strong> noun derives from the same root (<strong>of</strong> the<br />

verb ) that probably also gave rise to the word chymeia ( or<br />

), attested at a later date and from which we ultimately got chemistry.<br />

86<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern concept <strong>of</strong> a molecule has an interesting forerunner in the page 187<br />

83 See pages 223–224.<br />

84 Stobaeus, Eclogae I, xvii, 154, 8 –155, 14 (ed. Wachsmuth) = [SVF], II, 471. Other passages on the<br />

same point are Philo <strong>of</strong> Alexandria, De confusione linguarum, II, 264 (ed. Wendland) = [SVF], II, 472,<br />

and Alexander <strong>of</strong> Aphrodisias, De mixtione, 216, 14 – 218, 6; 221 = [SVF], II, 473, 474.<br />

85 <strong>The</strong> most intimate combination <strong>of</strong> substances considered by Aristotle is the homogeneous mixture,<br />

which he calls by the terms and © (De generatione et corruptione, 328a).<br />

86 In Arabic the adjunction <strong>of</strong> the article transformed the Greek word into alchimia, which coexisted<br />

in Latin for centuries with chimia. In the modern age, chemistry ennobled itself by appropriating<br />

the Greek name, but usually when the Greek science is referred to, the Arabic word<br />

is scornfully used. This strange situation illustrates the complex and contradictory way in which<br />

modern scientists have regarded the relationship between themselves and the classical tradition.<br />

Revision: 1.9 Date: 2002/09/14 19:12:01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!