14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.9 Where Do the Clichés about “Ancient <strong>Science</strong>” Come From? 173<br />

to the development <strong>of</strong> even very sophisticated forms <strong>of</strong> deductive reasoning,<br />

such as arose in classical Greece; but one would expect in this context<br />

variations in the choice <strong>of</strong> assumptions, to suit the needs <strong>of</strong> the moment. 82<br />

A second important effect <strong>of</strong> the diffusion <strong>of</strong> books was the fostering<br />

<strong>of</strong> a conventional terminology. Anything like Archimedes’ definition <strong>of</strong> page 220<br />

“ball-shape”, which associates a new meaning to an old word, is likely<br />

meant to be written, not just spoken. Only those who, like Archimedes<br />

or Herophilus, know that their work will last in the written medium and<br />

remain available to specialists in the subject can change the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

a term without causing confusion. Thus, it seems not to be a coincidence<br />

that linguistic conventionalism and nominalist definitions arose around<br />

the time when written culture emancipated itself from oral culture.<br />

Because a fully scientific methodology (in our sense <strong>of</strong> “scientific”) requires<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> vast unified theories, based on shared premises<br />

and precisely defined terms, what we have called the scientific revolution<br />

seems to assume as prerequisite the diffusion <strong>of</strong> written culture, 83 and so<br />

would have been impossible before the fourth century. Of course, the diffusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> writing came at a cost (which Plato thought was too high). In<br />

particular, the homogeneity <strong>of</strong> methods and premises that allowed any<br />

student to solve as an “exercise” a problem internal to a full-fledged scientific<br />

theory is paid for by the giving up <strong>of</strong> many ideas which, although<br />

present in the earlier culture, for various reasons did not make it into the<br />

victorious systematization.<br />

6.9 Where Do the Clichés about “Ancient <strong>Science</strong>” Come<br />

From?<br />

This book espouses theses openly opposed to certain fairly widespread<br />

opinions about “ancient science”, summarizable in three interconnected<br />

statements:<br />

a. <strong>The</strong> Ancients did not know the experimental method.<br />

b. Ancient science was a speculative form <strong>of</strong> knowledge, unconcerned<br />

with applications. page 221<br />

c. <strong>The</strong> Greeks created mathematics but not physics.<br />

We discussed the experimental method in Section 6.7. This section tries to<br />

explain the origin <strong>of</strong> the other two assertions.<br />

82 See page 31 and also Plato, Meno, 86e–87b.<br />

83 Of course this prerequisite is not sufficient. Egyptian culture had used writing for millennia,<br />

but its evolution led in other directions.<br />

Revision: 1.7 Date: 2002/09/14 23:17:37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!