14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.8 <strong>The</strong> Shape <strong>of</strong> the Earth: Sling or Ellipsoid? 269<br />

<strong>of</strong> these motions. Since no other argument in support <strong>of</strong> heliocentrism has<br />

ever been found in classical literature, apart from the one reconstructed in<br />

Section 10.5, it seems reasonable to suppose that Seleucus based both his<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> tides and his pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> heliocentrism on the sun’s gravitational<br />

effect.<br />

Note that if one thinks (as suggested by the passages in Plutarch and<br />

Seneca) that lunar attraction and centrifugal force act on the earth jointly page 335<br />

and in opposite directions, it is not hard to accept that high tide takes<br />

place simultaneously at antipodal points. Thus the dynamical explanation<br />

<strong>of</strong> heliocentrism turns out to open up avenues for justifying theoretically<br />

a fundamental observed property <strong>of</strong> tides.<br />

In trying to track the origin <strong>of</strong> the ideas about gravity that seem to<br />

be present in Hipparchus, we end up with Seleucus: probably a contemporary<br />

<strong>of</strong> Hipparchus, but older. One could perhaps conjecture that the<br />

younger scientist accepted and developed the notion, first advanced by<br />

Seleucus, <strong>of</strong> a gravitational interaction with the sun. This conjecture cannot<br />

be proved, but it is consistent with Strabo’s remark that Hipparchus<br />

regarded Seleucus as an authority on tides. 131<br />

10.8 <strong>The</strong> Shape <strong>of</strong> the Earth: Sling or Ellipsoid?<br />

Some histories <strong>of</strong> geography say that one <strong>of</strong> the shapes given the earth in<br />

Antiquity was a sling. Behind this strange claim are obscure statements<br />

in late sources. Agathemerus, writing probably in the third century A.D.,<br />

says that Posidonius described the ge (earth or land) as sling-shaped. 131a<br />

<strong>The</strong> twelfth-century Byzantine archbishop Eustathius writes in a commentary<br />

on Homer: “Posidonius the Stoic and Dionysius say that the ge is<br />

shaped like a sling.” 132<br />

We don’t know what Posidonius really said. As to Dionysius, a poet<br />

from the third century A.D. (nicknamed Periegetes from the title <strong>of</strong> his<br />

short geographical poem, Oikoumenes periegesis or Sketch <strong>of</strong> the world), the<br />

expression he uses is like a sling (¦ ).<br />

Commentators have tried to save the day by taking ge to mean the dry<br />

land, a natural meaning <strong>of</strong> the word but one that makes the analogy no<br />

less enigmatic. As for a sling-shaped earth, the idea is just too odd to<br />

131 Strabo, Geography, I, i, 9. See [Russo: Seleuco] for an analysis <strong>of</strong> all the testimonia on Seleucus,<br />

and in particular <strong>of</strong> a passage <strong>of</strong> Aetius ([DG], 383, 9) that has, in my opinion, led astray many<br />

scholars, including Galileo.<br />

131a ¥ © ¦ and he continues <br />

© (Agathemerus, I, i).<br />

132 Eustathius, In Homeri Iliadem, vi, 446.<br />

Revision: 1.11 Date: 2003/01/06 02:20:46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!