24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

poison <strong>of</strong> the devil’. 152 Aurelian’s version is even briefer: ‘Non juretis: quia Dominus<br />

dixit: Nolite jurare’ (‘Do not swear: because the Lord said: do not swear’), to which,<br />

admittedly, he does add another scriptural citation. 153 The respective chapters <strong>of</strong> these<br />

rules were gradually stripped back to their basic message.<br />

As in the rule <strong>of</strong> Caesarius, Aurelian provides for the entertainment <strong>of</strong> visiting<br />

religious. Both forbid the provision <strong>of</strong> meals for relatives, bishops, lay people or local<br />

dignitaries. In a slight relaxation <strong>of</strong> this stricture, Aurelian also permits the entry <strong>of</strong><br />

‘approved’ lay men, whom the monks could meet in the presence <strong>of</strong> the abbot, the prior<br />

or another senior monk. 154 While Caesarius and Aurelian’s rules for nuns permit the entry<br />

<strong>of</strong> dedicated women <strong>of</strong> unblemished character and travelling abbots and monks, 155 the<br />

latter’s rule for monks forbids the entry <strong>of</strong> any women, whether a relative or not, and<br />

whether religiosae or saeculares. 156 This is in itself a useful reminder <strong>of</strong> the continued<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> such women who did not reside in formally defined and enclosed<br />

communities. It also begs the question <strong>of</strong> why such dedicated women might have wanted<br />

to enter a community <strong>of</strong> men. Clearly the widowed mothers or sisters <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants<br />

might have visited; a more intriguing possibility might be that <strong>of</strong> the nuns <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> John<br />

making the pilgrimage to visit relics there. In any case, neither men nor relics were to be<br />

accessible to women.<br />

In one difference with the monastery <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> John, the provisor did not have to be a<br />

religious. Aurelian notes that ‘even the provisors <strong>of</strong> the monastery, if they wear lay habit,<br />

will not be permitted to enter’. 157 This was repeated in his rule for nuns. This might<br />

reflect Aurelian’s closer connections with his royal patrons: those acting as stewards for<br />

the abbey might be in some senses have been co-appointed by all those with an interest in<br />

the monasteries.<br />

152<br />

RV 3 : ‘Iuramentum et maledictum velut venenum diaboli fugere et vitare contendant’.<br />

153<br />

Reg. Aureliani monachorum 9.<br />

154<br />

Reg. Aureliani monachorum 16.<br />

155<br />

RV 39; 40. Reg. Aureliani virginum 14.<br />

156<br />

Reg. Aureliani monachorum 15.<br />

157<br />

Reg. Aureliani monachorum 19.<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!