24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monastery to face examination on charges <strong>of</strong> sheltering the royal fugitive. In addition to<br />

creating one <strong>of</strong> the most dramatic moments in the narrative, this highlights attitudes to the<br />

permanent enclosure so strongly enforced by Caesarius. On the one hand, it is evident<br />

that neither the king nor local <strong>of</strong>ficials saw the monastery’s rule as a particular bar to<br />

gaining access to Rusticula. One such, Audoald, a follower <strong>of</strong> the local governor<br />

Ricomer, tried to strike Rusticula with a sword. 118 Clearly, Caesarius’ prohibitions on<br />

entry to the community were not a sufficient deterrent. On the other hand, both Rusticula<br />

and her nuns clung to the requirements <strong>of</strong> enclosure as a defence against the summons to<br />

answer the charges against her. The governor <strong>of</strong> the city, Nymfidius, had to be persuaded<br />

to go to the monastery and ask her to come out voluntarily, suggesting that lay optimates<br />

had no authority to remove her by force, even if they themselves felt able to go in. After<br />

seven days’ imprisonment at an unnamed monastery in Arles, for which an obvious<br />

possible location must be Aurelian’s foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> Mary, Rusticula was taken to<br />

Clothar. In the meantime, bishop Domnolus <strong>of</strong> Vienne interceded for her, possibly at the<br />

synod <strong>of</strong> Paris in 614. 119 As Riché notes, the theme <strong>of</strong> this synod was the defence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> the Church against abuses <strong>of</strong> royal power. 120 This episode is a sharp reminder <strong>of</strong><br />

the place <strong>of</strong> abbesses and their monasteries within the wider church. It is easy to perceive<br />

female communities as being on the fringes <strong>of</strong> the church, concerned only with their own<br />

activities: indeed, the surviving rules, typically written by a bishop for a named<br />

individual woman, can foster that impression. 121 Domnolus’ intervention underlines both<br />

a general awareness <strong>of</strong> female communities and the fact that they were perceived to be an<br />

integral part <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the Church.<br />

The long description <strong>of</strong> Rusticula’s death provides a strong insight into the<br />

expected role <strong>of</strong> the abbess in the monastery. At seventy-seven, Rusticula had been<br />

abbess for fifty-nine years; in that time, it is likely that most nuns would have known no<br />

118 For Ricomer’s status, see SWDA, 127, n. 30.<br />

119 Riché, ‘La Vita S. Rusticulae’, 374. See also O. Pontal, Die Synoden im Merowingerreich (Paderborn,<br />

1986), at 183, for Domnolus’ presence at the council.<br />

120 Riché, ‘La Vita S. Rusticulae’, 374.<br />

121 The obvious examples are Caesarius himself, Leander <strong>of</strong> Seville, and Donatus <strong>of</strong> Besançon.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!