24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

foundation <strong>of</strong> religious houses had become a commendable activity for a bishop. The<br />

silence <strong>of</strong> the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> the regula Tarnantensis extends to its<br />

author and his motivations; regrettably the rule as preserved by Benedict <strong>of</strong> Aniane<br />

contains no explanatory preface. Ferreolus made his foundation on his own land, which<br />

happened to be in another bishop’s diocese. Its accompanying rule carefully records some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the negotiations that occurred around the foundation. The fact that Ferreolus made the<br />

foundation on his own land, however, does suggest that a personal desire (and <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

the availability <strong>of</strong> the property itself) to do so, rather than episcopal strategy, lay behind<br />

it. In that sense Ferreolus’ foundation has much in common with Radegund’s monastery<br />

<strong>of</strong> Holy Cross, in that both were made in some regard according to the personal desires<br />

and for the personal benefit <strong>of</strong> their founder. However, this may be too simplistic an<br />

interpretation. It may also rely too much on traditionally gendered readings <strong>of</strong> the act <strong>of</strong><br />

foundation. How far, for instance, was Radegund’s foundation just as much a political act<br />

as Aurelian’s, or as responsive to the perceived spiritual needs <strong>of</strong> her community as<br />

Caesarius’? Radegund had a personal involvement in Holy Cross in a way in which<br />

Caesarius and Aurelian were not involved in their foundations, but her personal desire for<br />

claustration should not, as is the case in so many historiographical narratives <strong>of</strong><br />

foundations by and for women, be taken to imply the absence <strong>of</strong> other, wider<br />

motivations. 177<br />

Seventh-century change? Donatus <strong>of</strong> Besançon, Columbanus, and Faremoutiers<br />

The third ripple outwards from the writing <strong>of</strong> the Regula virginum did not occur<br />

until the middle <strong>of</strong> the seventh century, when Donatus, the bishop <strong>of</strong> Besançon (626-<br />

658), composed a monastic rule for his mother Flavia, and her community <strong>of</strong><br />

Jussamoutier. 178 Donatus, however, did not solely look to the Arles rule when thinking<br />

177 An overtly political context for Radegund’s foundation has been advanced, that Radegund’s religious<br />

life was a lifelong act <strong>of</strong> expiation for Chlothar having murdered her brother at the same time as taking her<br />

prisoner, acts described in Radegund’s poem on the Thuringian war: see Y. Labande-Mailfert, ‘Les débuts<br />

de Sainte-Croix’, in E.-R. Labande et al, Histoire de l’abbaye de Sainte-Croix de Poitiers. Quatorze siècles<br />

de vie monastique (Mémoires de la société des Antiquitaires de l’Ouest 4e sér., 19 (1986-7), 21-60, at 32.<br />

178 Donatus <strong>of</strong> Besançon, Regula virginum PL 87: 273-298. See also A. de Vogüé, ‘La Règle de Donat pour<br />

l’abbesse Gauthstrude. Texte critique et synopse des sources’, Benedictina 25 (1978) 219-313. J.A.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!