Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
foundation <strong>of</strong> religious houses had become a commendable activity for a bishop. The<br />
silence <strong>of</strong> the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> the regula Tarnantensis extends to its<br />
author and his motivations; regrettably the rule as preserved by Benedict <strong>of</strong> Aniane<br />
contains no explanatory preface. Ferreolus made his foundation on his own land, which<br />
happened to be in another bishop’s diocese. Its accompanying rule carefully records some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the negotiations that occurred around the foundation. The fact that Ferreolus made the<br />
foundation on his own land, however, does suggest that a personal desire (and <strong>of</strong> course,<br />
the availability <strong>of</strong> the property itself) to do so, rather than episcopal strategy, lay behind<br />
it. In that sense Ferreolus’ foundation has much in common with Radegund’s monastery<br />
<strong>of</strong> Holy Cross, in that both were made in some regard according to the personal desires<br />
and for the personal benefit <strong>of</strong> their founder. However, this may be too simplistic an<br />
interpretation. It may also rely too much on traditionally gendered readings <strong>of</strong> the act <strong>of</strong><br />
foundation. How far, for instance, was Radegund’s foundation just as much a political act<br />
as Aurelian’s, or as responsive to the perceived spiritual needs <strong>of</strong> her community as<br />
Caesarius’? Radegund had a personal involvement in Holy Cross in a way in which<br />
Caesarius and Aurelian were not involved in their foundations, but her personal desire for<br />
claustration should not, as is the case in so many historiographical narratives <strong>of</strong><br />
foundations by and for women, be taken to imply the absence <strong>of</strong> other, wider<br />
motivations. 177<br />
Seventh-century change? Donatus <strong>of</strong> Besançon, Columbanus, and Faremoutiers<br />
The third ripple outwards from the writing <strong>of</strong> the Regula virginum did not occur<br />
until the middle <strong>of</strong> the seventh century, when Donatus, the bishop <strong>of</strong> Besançon (626-<br />
658), composed a monastic rule for his mother Flavia, and her community <strong>of</strong><br />
Jussamoutier. 178 Donatus, however, did not solely look to the Arles rule when thinking<br />
177 An overtly political context for Radegund’s foundation has been advanced, that Radegund’s religious<br />
life was a lifelong act <strong>of</strong> expiation for Chlothar having murdered her brother at the same time as taking her<br />
prisoner, acts described in Radegund’s poem on the Thuringian war: see Y. Labande-Mailfert, ‘Les débuts<br />
de Sainte-Croix’, in E.-R. Labande et al, Histoire de l’abbaye de Sainte-Croix de Poitiers. Quatorze siècles<br />
de vie monastique (Mémoires de la société des Antiquitaires de l’Ouest 4e sér., 19 (1986-7), 21-60, at 32.<br />
178 Donatus <strong>of</strong> Besançon, Regula virginum PL 87: 273-298. See also A. de Vogüé, ‘La Règle de Donat pour<br />
l’abbesse Gauthstrude. Texte critique et synopse des sources’, Benedictina 25 (1978) 219-313. J.A.<br />
109