24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benedict was making his collection, but equally Benedict may not have seen a real need<br />

to record a rule which was based so clearly on another, the Regula virginum. However,<br />

the small number <strong>of</strong> extant copies is surprising given that the rule was sent ‘to diverse<br />

monasteries’. 21 The first, Brussels, Bibliothèque Royale, 8780-8793 (2493), dates from<br />

the eighth century. 22 The second, Paris, BN ms. Lat. 1564, dates to the late eighth or early<br />

ninth century, and Lowe suggested that the manuscript was copied in northern France,<br />

probably in the same scriptorium in a female house that produced numerous codices for<br />

archbishop Hildebald <strong>of</strong> Cologne (785-819). 23 This manuscript includes a prologue<br />

describing how the rule came to be circulated: ‘Here begins the rule sent by saint<br />

Teridius, priest and abbot, nephew <strong>of</strong> saint Caesarius the bishop <strong>of</strong> Arles, <strong>of</strong> blessed<br />

memory, requested by my humble self. He said that this was dictated to him by<br />

Caesarius, his master. He himself [Caesarius] sent this to diverse monasteries while he<br />

was bishop. All those who seek God here will learn to follow the royal road by the rule,<br />

not turning aside to the left or the right. Nor shall each do what he wants, but what he is<br />

ordered.’ 24 De Vogüé makes the plausible case that this anonymous voice belongs to<br />

Aunacharius, bishop <strong>of</strong> Auxerre (561-605). 25 Although the first nine folios <strong>of</strong> the<br />

manuscript (items 1-29) are missing, the remainder appears to form a collection <strong>of</strong> Gallic<br />

pieces, those most likely to be <strong>of</strong> interest to a bishop at that time. Paris BN Lat. 1564<br />

contains nothing more recent than a letter from pope Pelagius II to Aunacharius, dated 5<br />

October 580. 26 A second letter from Pelagius, dated 31 October 586, is not included, so<br />

Aunacharius probably made his collection between 583 and 586. 27 The reason for<br />

Aunacharius’ interest in monasticism in his diocese is shown by the presence <strong>of</strong> seven<br />

abbot signatories at the synod <strong>of</strong> Auxerre (585/588). 28 While giving a rule to the<br />

21<br />

Reg. Mon. praef., de Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moines, 204.<br />

22<br />

Van den Gheyn Catalogue des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Royale de Belgique IV, 1-2.<br />

23<br />

CLA vol. 5; no.529. CGM II 68-9. The catalogue entry notes that the manuscript may have come from a<br />

church in Le Mans.<br />

24<br />

Reg. Mon. praef: Incipit regula a sancto Teridio presbytero, nepote beatae memoriae sancti Caesarii<br />

episcopi Arelatinsis, abbate, mea persona parva rogante transmissa. Quam a suo supra memorato domino<br />

Caesario dixit ipse dictatam. Quam dum est sacerdos ipse per diversa monasteria transmittebat.<br />

Quicumque deum expeterent, discerent regulariter viam tenere regiam, non declinantes ad dexteram neque<br />

ad sinistram. Nec unusquisque quod vult sed iubetur faciat. De Vogüé, Œuvres pour les moines, 204-5.<br />

25<br />

De Vogüé, Œuvres pour les moines, 192-199.<br />

26<br />

Pelagius II, Ep. 2, PL 72:705.<br />

27<br />

De Vogüé, Œuvres pour les moines, 193; see also n.5.<br />

28<br />

Auxerre (585/588) CCSL 148A, 271-2.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!