24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

victory at the battle <strong>of</strong> Tertry in 687. However, the process <strong>of</strong> aligning these lands with<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the existing kingdoms <strong>of</strong> Gaul continued well into the eighth century, and the<br />

northern areas were the heartlands <strong>of</strong> the court even before the change <strong>of</strong> ruler to an<br />

Austrasian dynasty, the Pippinids or Carolingians, in 751. Royal interest in the northern<br />

lands meant that much <strong>of</strong> Gaul – Aquitaine, Provence and Burgundy – was ruled by<br />

effectively independent dynasties <strong>of</strong> dukes. At a more local level, bishops, based in the<br />

old Roman civitates, wielded a great deal <strong>of</strong> authority. Accusations <strong>of</strong> treason against<br />

bishops appear commonplace in the Libri historiarum <strong>of</strong> Gregory <strong>of</strong> Tours: their local<br />

power, and the friction this could cause with secular rulers, cannot help but be underlined<br />

by these stories. While much <strong>of</strong> the present study is deeply informed by the<br />

configurations <strong>of</strong> both secular and episcopal power, it must at the same time cut across<br />

such structures.<br />

Historiography<br />

There is already a vast literature on early medieval dedicated women, largely the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the increasing interest in ‘women’s history’ since the 1960s. It is still true to say,<br />

as did Deborah Thom in 1992, that ‘[t]he history the historian writes is the history <strong>of</strong> her<br />

own times’. 14 One <strong>of</strong> the earliest works on the subject, Lina Eckenstein’s Women under<br />

Monasticism, was written by one <strong>of</strong> the earliest female scholars at Cambridge, and<br />

published in 1896. Eckenstein based her work upon the principle that ‘a clearer insight<br />

into the social standards and habits <strong>of</strong> life prevalent in past ages will aid us in a better<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> the relative importance <strong>of</strong> those factors <strong>of</strong> change we find around us to-<br />

day.’ 15 For Eckenstein, one <strong>of</strong> the most important lessons <strong>of</strong> the past was that ‘[t]he right<br />

to self-development and social responsibility which the woman <strong>of</strong> to-day so persistently<br />

asks for, is in many ways analogous to the right which the convent secured for<br />

14 Thom, ‘A lop-sided view’, 28.<br />

15 L. Eckenstein, Woman under Monasticism: chapters on saint-lore and convent life between AD 500 and<br />

AD 1500 (Cambridge, 1896), vii. For more on Eckenstein, and other women medievalists, see now J.<br />

Chance (ed.) Women Medievalists and the Academy (Wisconsin, 2005).<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!