Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Furthermore, ‘Columbanian’ monasteries were governed by the same alliance <strong>of</strong><br />
interests that earlier foundations had been, even if these interests themselves differed<br />
slightly. The combination <strong>of</strong> family piety and episcopal need that drove the foundations<br />
<strong>of</strong> Caesaria and, probably, Tarsicia was now the combination <strong>of</strong> family piety melded with<br />
Columbanus’ perceived need for re-evangelising the region and for missionary work,<br />
providing a background for the coenobium <strong>of</strong> Burgund<strong>of</strong>ara. It therefore seems<br />
something <strong>of</strong> an overstatement to suggest, as does Pierre Riché, that ‘Despite itself the<br />
Merovingian Church was saved by the presence <strong>of</strong> Columbanus and his monks. The Irish<br />
tonic spread and revived the sclerotic body.’ 215 This may have been the impression Jonas<br />
wished to record for posterity, but it cannot be accepted unchallenged.<br />
Burgund<strong>of</strong>ara and the monastery <strong>of</strong> Eboriac<br />
It is to the foundation <strong>of</strong> one particular monastery, that <strong>of</strong> Eboriac, that we now<br />
turn. From the beginning, it is useful to bear in mind the differences between this<br />
foundation and that <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> John, particularly in terms <strong>of</strong> the people involved. The<br />
foundation <strong>of</strong> Eboriac is described in Jonas’ account <strong>of</strong> Columbanus and his followers.<br />
However, it appears not in the section dedicated to the miracles and visions experienced<br />
in the monastery, but in the portion <strong>of</strong> the work recounting the life <strong>of</strong> Eustasius, abbot <strong>of</strong><br />
Luxeuil. This has implications for the way in which new foundations resulting from<br />
Columbanus’ presence were conceived; the issue, for Jonas and hence for his audience,<br />
seems to have been the tension between monastic and lay responsibility for new<br />
foundations. Evidently, the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the foundation are included for the<br />
glorification <strong>of</strong> Eustasius, rather than for that <strong>of</strong> Burgund<strong>of</strong>ara or the wider circle <strong>of</strong><br />
Faronids; the foundation is in his vita, not hers. Of course, one reservation may be<br />
expressed, in that the section on Eboriac is in the form <strong>of</strong> a miracula, rather than a vita<br />
Burgund<strong>of</strong>arae. Such a vita Burgund<strong>of</strong>arae could not be composed or included while the<br />
subject was yet living. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> the foundation in that section would therefore<br />
have interrupted the tightly planned and heavily didactic series <strong>of</strong> visions. The foundation<br />
215 P. Riché, ‘Columbanus, his Followers and the Merovingian Church’, 65.<br />
119