24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sermons and writings within the diocese <strong>of</strong> Arles, for the benefit <strong>of</strong> priests, and through<br />

them the people, and also to monks. In addition to the sermons aimed at monastic<br />

communities, Caesarius also prepared a Regula monachorum for the male communities<br />

he oversaw. 15 This regula monachorum was a summary <strong>of</strong> the final version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

women’s rule produced in the 530s, although it has some substantial differences from its<br />

inspiration. 16<br />

Partly these differences stem from the destinations <strong>of</strong> the two rules. While the<br />

Regula virginum was intended for a particular community, the regula monachorum<br />

contains no references to an individual monastery. Caesarius describes it merely as ‘a rule<br />

that one should have in a monastery where there is an abbot’. 17 The Regula virginum<br />

contains several references to particular locations within the complex <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> John, but the<br />

regula monachorum is composed in much more neutral terms for wider usage. 18 In<br />

contrast to the rule for nuns, which Caesarius himself named a regula sanctarum<br />

virginum, the manuscript tradition <strong>of</strong> the rule for monks shows that it had no such title or<br />

description: indeed, as de Vogüé has pointed out, the word monachus appears nowhere in<br />

the rule. 19 As in the case <strong>of</strong> the Regula virginum, Caesarius’ rule for monks, which seems<br />

to have been intended for all the monks <strong>of</strong> his diocese, reflects his own feeling <strong>of</strong> urgency<br />

to build the best possible dedicated life in general to act as a standard for the Christian<br />

population <strong>of</strong> the diocese <strong>of</strong> Arles as a whole.<br />

Only two Regula monachorum manuscripts survive. The text was not included in<br />

Benedict <strong>of</strong> Aniane’s Codex regularum, although Holste inserted it into his edition <strong>of</strong><br />

1661. 20 De Vogüé suggests that this implies a lack <strong>of</strong> circulation <strong>of</strong> the rule when<br />

15<br />

The Regula monachorum [Reg. Mon.] is in Morin II, 149-155. A newer edition and further commentary<br />

is available in de Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moines.<br />

16<br />

The Regula virginum was established as the earlier text by A. de Vogüe, ‘La Règle de Césaire d’Arles<br />

pour les moines: un résumé de sa Règle pour les moniales’ Revue d’Histoire de la Spiritualité (1971) 369-<br />

406, which also discusses the relationship between the two rules.<br />

17<br />

Reg. Mon. 1: In Christi nomine regula qualem debeant habere in monasterio ubi abba est quicumque<br />

fuerit. De Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moines, 204.<br />

18<br />

De Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moniales, 43.<br />

19<br />

De Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moines, 165.<br />

20<br />

M-E. Bouillet ‘Le vrai ‘Codex Regularum’ de saint Benoît d’Aniane’ Revue Bénédictine 75 (1965) 345-<br />

50, at 345-9.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!