Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
thought and purity <strong>of</strong> heart. 91 Chapter 25 <strong>of</strong> the Regula Benedicti is accompanied by the<br />
entirety <strong>of</strong> chapter 22 <strong>of</strong> Caesarius’ rule followed by the three Dicta Caesariae. The<br />
earliest manuscript <strong>of</strong> the Concordia confirms that this time Benedict did know the<br />
identity and gender <strong>of</strong> the author. 92 Obviously on this basis it cannot be claimed that<br />
Benedict viewed the writings <strong>of</strong> male and female religious with equal enthusiasm. But<br />
neither was the gender <strong>of</strong> the writer so great an obstacle that the abbess’ writings could<br />
not be used at all or had to be attributed to Caesarius.<br />
Of course, the connection <strong>of</strong> these texts to Caesarius raises its own questions.<br />
Benedict’s antiquarianism, suggested by J. M. Wallace-Hadrill in terms <strong>of</strong> the Codex,<br />
might further imply that having acquired such a large dossier <strong>of</strong> material from Arles,<br />
most <strong>of</strong> which written by or based on the writings <strong>of</strong> Caesarius, Benedict wanted to use<br />
as many <strong>of</strong> the items as he could. 93 This in turn returns us yet again to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />
Caesarius’ own standing among the Carolingians. Can the relatively large extent to which<br />
his rule for nuns was used be indicative <strong>of</strong> anything more than Benedict’s regard for him,<br />
as opposed to a gauge <strong>of</strong> the standing in which texts written for women were held in<br />
general?<br />
In comparison with the Codex, some general observations can be made. Works<br />
intended for women are used to an even smaller degree, but to an extent this can be<br />
explained by the different purposes each text had: the Codex was a collection, a summary<br />
<strong>of</strong> monastic life made for Benedict’s own use in order to assess the merits and faults <strong>of</strong><br />
the past before moving on; the Concordia was the textual basis <strong>of</strong> that moving on,<br />
centred around the regula Benedicti, which in turn affected the other texts that could be<br />
used. One possible explanation for this must be that the use <strong>of</strong> texts written for men<br />
reflects a concern on the part <strong>of</strong> Benedict only with the reform and monastic standards <strong>of</strong><br />
monks, and this will be explored in the remainder <strong>of</strong> this chapter. For the present,<br />
however, this conclusion is not so straightforward to draw. Benedict came from a male<br />
monastic environment; these were the rules with which he was familiar. In addition,<br />
91 De Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moniales, 418-439 (O Pr<strong>of</strong>undum); 470-5 (Dicta Caesariae).<br />
92 P. Bonnerue, Benedicti Anianensis Concordia Regularum CCCM 168 (Turnhout, 1999), 92.<br />
93 Wallace-Hadrill, The Frankish Church, 230.<br />
236