24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

thought and purity <strong>of</strong> heart. 91 Chapter 25 <strong>of</strong> the Regula Benedicti is accompanied by the<br />

entirety <strong>of</strong> chapter 22 <strong>of</strong> Caesarius’ rule followed by the three Dicta Caesariae. The<br />

earliest manuscript <strong>of</strong> the Concordia confirms that this time Benedict did know the<br />

identity and gender <strong>of</strong> the author. 92 Obviously on this basis it cannot be claimed that<br />

Benedict viewed the writings <strong>of</strong> male and female religious with equal enthusiasm. But<br />

neither was the gender <strong>of</strong> the writer so great an obstacle that the abbess’ writings could<br />

not be used at all or had to be attributed to Caesarius.<br />

Of course, the connection <strong>of</strong> these texts to Caesarius raises its own questions.<br />

Benedict’s antiquarianism, suggested by J. M. Wallace-Hadrill in terms <strong>of</strong> the Codex,<br />

might further imply that having acquired such a large dossier <strong>of</strong> material from Arles,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> which written by or based on the writings <strong>of</strong> Caesarius, Benedict wanted to use<br />

as many <strong>of</strong> the items as he could. 93 This in turn returns us yet again to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

Caesarius’ own standing among the Carolingians. Can the relatively large extent to which<br />

his rule for nuns was used be indicative <strong>of</strong> anything more than Benedict’s regard for him,<br />

as opposed to a gauge <strong>of</strong> the standing in which texts written for women were held in<br />

general?<br />

In comparison with the Codex, some general observations can be made. Works<br />

intended for women are used to an even smaller degree, but to an extent this can be<br />

explained by the different purposes each text had: the Codex was a collection, a summary<br />

<strong>of</strong> monastic life made for Benedict’s own use in order to assess the merits and faults <strong>of</strong><br />

the past before moving on; the Concordia was the textual basis <strong>of</strong> that moving on,<br />

centred around the regula Benedicti, which in turn affected the other texts that could be<br />

used. One possible explanation for this must be that the use <strong>of</strong> texts written for men<br />

reflects a concern on the part <strong>of</strong> Benedict only with the reform and monastic standards <strong>of</strong><br />

monks, and this will be explored in the remainder <strong>of</strong> this chapter. For the present,<br />

however, this conclusion is not so straightforward to draw. Benedict came from a male<br />

monastic environment; these were the rules with which he was familiar. In addition,<br />

91 De Vogüé, Oeuvres pour les moniales, 418-439 (O Pr<strong>of</strong>undum); 470-5 (Dicta Caesariae).<br />

92 P. Bonnerue, Benedicti Anianensis Concordia Regularum CCCM 168 (Turnhout, 1999), 92.<br />

93 Wallace-Hadrill, The Frankish Church, 230.<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!