24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While canons such as these may reflect previous legislation and older conceptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the problems associated with female monastic life, Charlemagne’s legislation also<br />

reflects new priorities. By far the greatest proportion <strong>of</strong> articles referring to abbesses do<br />

so as part <strong>of</strong> discussions <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the leading members <strong>of</strong> Carolingian<br />

society: counts, bishops, abbots and abbesses, all having a role in the re-formation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Christian society. This was made particularly clear in the programmatic capitulary <strong>of</strong> 802.<br />

Charlemagne’s first requirement was that these groups should be in accord with each<br />

other, so that ‘always, everywhere, a just judgment on a matter may be effected because<br />

<strong>of</strong> them and among them.’ 22 On this foundation, counts, bishops and monasteries should<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer protection to the poor, widows, orphans and pilgrims, in order to secure<br />

Charlemagne’s passage to eternal life. 23 Charlemagne’s legislation thus reflects a tension<br />

between, on the one hand, a clear recognition <strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> abbesses within society, as<br />

keepers <strong>of</strong> the peace, upholders <strong>of</strong> the law, responsible lords, and members <strong>of</strong> aristocratic<br />

society and a perception <strong>of</strong> the more longstanding problems associated with women<br />

religious.<br />

Such prescriptive sources as these can only shed a partial light on religious<br />

women during the reign <strong>of</strong> Charlemagne, and it is to Charlemagne’s sister Gisela, in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> other documented Deo devotae, that we must return. As the abbess <strong>of</strong> Chelles,<br />

much <strong>of</strong> Charlemagne’s legislation was directly applicable to her, and yet it is evident<br />

that she was not bound by the requirement <strong>of</strong> the capitulary <strong>of</strong> Herstal that she remain<br />

always at Chelles; 24 indeed, the activities <strong>of</strong> Gisela and other abbesses may have lain<br />

behind the later canon <strong>of</strong> Chalons that recognised their need to leave the monastery. As<br />

another court poet, Theodulf, puts it,<br />

If the king’s most holy sister should happen to be there<br />

let her give kisses to her brother and he to her.<br />

Let her restrain her great joy with a tranquil expression<br />

22<br />

Capitulare missorum generale (802), can. I. MGH Capit. I, 92.<br />

23<br />

Can. V.<br />

24<br />

Capit. Harist. (779), can. III. MGH Capit. I, 47.<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!