24.06.2013 Views

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Lindsay Rudge PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

indicators <strong>of</strong> a loss <strong>of</strong> the abbess’ former influence may be reading too far into canons<br />

composed with a subtly different purpose in mind. 18<br />

Subsequent capitularies continued to reflect older concerns with female religious<br />

life. The capitulary <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt (794) stated this explicitly with its note that older canons<br />

should be consulted for directives on the appropriate age for veiling a nun. 19 The so-<br />

called programmatic capitulary <strong>of</strong> 802 went so far as to outline the basic tenets <strong>of</strong> female<br />

dedicated life, noting the importance <strong>of</strong> an unbroken cloister, obedience, stability in one<br />

foundation and the rejection <strong>of</strong> women who were unwilling to follow the rule. 20 Yet these<br />

requirements were not merely cited because <strong>of</strong> their relative antiquity, or because they<br />

provided solutions to problems then besetting female monastic life. Rather, they reflect<br />

Charlemagne’s concern that members <strong>of</strong> religious communities should be able to fulfill<br />

adequately the role he had allotted them, that <strong>of</strong> praying for the safety and stability <strong>of</strong> his<br />

kingdom and empire.<br />

However, capitularies did express concern at some aspects <strong>of</strong> female religious<br />

life. It appears that female communities were seen as particularly prone to existing<br />

without recourse to any rule: the Frankfurt capitulary decreed that abbesses who lived<br />

without either the rule <strong>of</strong> canons (presumably Chrodegang’s) or a monastic rule<br />

(Benedict’s?), (quae canonice aut regulariter non vivunt) were to be deprived <strong>of</strong> their<br />

honor. 21 This may suggest the existence <strong>of</strong> smaller communities or family foundations,<br />

which did not actually follow a written rule. In essence this repeated Charlemagne’s edict<br />

<strong>of</strong> commission <strong>of</strong> 789, promulgated at the same time as the Admonitio Generalis, which<br />

attempted to combine very small communities <strong>of</strong> women into one larger one, based on a<br />

rule, under the authority <strong>of</strong> the bishop. It also states that no abbess or nun was to leave<br />

her enclosure without the bishop’s permission, that the writing or singing <strong>of</strong> vulgar songs<br />

was forbidden, and care should be taken over excessive bloodletting.<br />

been blessed by bishop Amand, the action and final decision are Rictrude’s. This further suggests that the<br />

legislation here is concerned with the authority <strong>of</strong> bishops, not <strong>of</strong> abbesses.<br />

18 S.F. Wemple Women in Frankish Society: Marriage and the Cloister 500-900 (Philadelphia, 1985), 169.<br />

19 Frankfurt (794), can. XLVI. MGH Capit. I, 77.<br />

20 Capitulare missorum generale (802), can. XVIII. MGH Capit. I, 95.<br />

21 Frankfurt (794), can. XLVII. MGH Capit. I, 77.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!