Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 93<br />
its elaboration it consisted of a geometrical derivation of the properties of<br />
spherical aberration. Like Tractatus, it rested on little more than the sine law<br />
<strong>and</strong> a generous dose of Euclidean geometry.<br />
In the elaboration of the theory of spherical aberration, geometry had the<br />
upper h<strong>and</strong>. This st<strong>and</strong>s out clearest in the simplifications Huygens<br />
employed. He used a simplified expression in order to determine the amount<br />
of aberration produced by a particular lens. He justified this by comparing<br />
the calculated differences between both expressions. What effects such<br />
differences would have in actual lenses, he did not tell. Nowhere in De<br />
Aberratione does Huygens give an indication that he had considered the<br />
question how the calculated properties of spherical aberration related to its<br />
observed properties. A modern reader would expect otherwise, but Huygens<br />
went about by geometrical deduction exclusively. This geometrical analysis<br />
resulted in a sophisticated theory of spherical aberration in which complex<br />
problems were solved of neutralizing it by configuring spherical lenses<br />
properly.<br />
But Huygens’ goal was not mere theory, he aimed at its practical<br />
application to real lenses <strong>and</strong> telescopes. This marked him off from his<br />
fellow dioptricians. Had he not applied his theory to design better telescopes<br />
<strong>and</strong> tested his design, he would not have been confronted with those<br />
disturbing colors. The fact that Huygens was taken by surprise by those<br />
disturbing colors need not surprise us. In his dioptrical study of lenses,<br />
Huygens confined himself to their mathematical properties <strong>and</strong> excluded the<br />
consideration of colors. Likewise, in his study of halos <strong>and</strong> parhelia, written<br />
around 1663, he confined himself to tracing the paths of rays of light<br />
through transparent particles in the atmosphere <strong>and</strong> left out any<br />
consideration of the colors of these phenomena. 180 Colors eluded the laws of<br />
geometry, so he wrote there with even greater conviction than in Tractatus:<br />
“However, to investigate the cause of these colors further; to know why they are<br />
generated in a prism, I want to undertake by no means, I admit on the contrary not to<br />
know the cause at all, <strong>and</strong> I think that no one will comprehend their nature easily for as<br />
long as some major light will not have enlightened the science of natural things.” 181<br />
That major light had come, it was named Newton, <strong>and</strong> it had eclipsed<br />
Huygens’ gr<strong>and</strong> project of perfecting telescopes.<br />
Huygens was well acquainted with the disturbing colors produced by<br />
lenses. Dealing with them was, in his view, a matter of trial-<strong>and</strong>-error<br />
configuring of lenses instead of purposive calculation. When colors came to<br />
disturb the predicted optimal working of his design, he did not do anything<br />
with them. Despite the importance of colors for his project, Huygens did not<br />
elaborate upon his observation that colors might be related to the angle of<br />
180 With connected reproduced in OC17, 364-516. On the dating see OC17, 359.<br />
181 OC17, 373. “Doch de reden van dese couleuren verder te ondersoecken, te weten waerom die in een<br />
prisma gegenereert worden, wil ick geensins ondernemen, emo fateor rationem eorum me prorsus<br />
ignorare, neque facile quemquam ipsas perspecturum arbitror qu<strong>and</strong>iu naturalium rerum scientiae major<br />
aliqua lux non affulserit.”