Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE 'PROJET' OF 1672 137<br />
consisted of six generally accepted principles required to elaborate<br />
mathematical theory. In a way reminiscent of the ‘Projet’, Barrow said that<br />
these hypotheses, as he called them, were empirically founded but also<br />
needed some sort of explanation:<br />
“The hypotheses agree with observation, but we must also fortify them with some<br />
support of reason, by treading on the foundations <strong>and</strong> suppositions laid down.” 105<br />
In his first lecture Barrow discussed these foundations <strong>and</strong> suppositions,<br />
although he mainly defined terms like ‘light’ (in relation to illumination,<br />
images, ‘phasmata’ <strong>and</strong> the like), ‘refraction’ <strong>and</strong> ‘opaque’. He then proposed<br />
a theory of light that is a hybrid of viewing light as a pulse <strong>and</strong> as a pressure<br />
propagated simultaneously in the first <strong>and</strong> second matter of the Cartesian<br />
scheme. 106 Whatever he meant precisely, Barrow did not lend much weight to<br />
this theory.<br />
“Still, since it is desirable for me to lay some preliminary foundations about the nature of<br />
light, to agree with my explanation of hypotheses which I shall later offer, I conceive<br />
the facts to be these, or something like them: …” 107<br />
These preliminary foundations merely needed to be consistent with the<br />
ensuing explanations of the laws of optics <strong>and</strong> Barrow expressly did not<br />
claim any authority in these matters. 108 In what followed, Barrow’s theory of<br />
light came down to considering a ray to be the path traced out by a pulse-like<br />
entity, “… two-dimensional <strong>and</strong> like a sort of rectangular parallelogram lying<br />
in a plane at right angles to the surface of the inflecting medium, …” 109 This<br />
conception of a physical ray traced out by a line of light emitted by a shining<br />
object went back to Hobbes’ theory of light. Barrow’s derivation of the law<br />
of sines can likewise be traced back to Hobbes. 110 With this definition of a<br />
ray, Barrow now could make ‘some attempt to explain’ the laws of optics,<br />
stressing once more that they were empirically founded:<br />
“… I need practically nothing else to explain the hypotheses which all opticians in<br />
common with each other assume <strong>and</strong> which must necessarily be laid down as a<br />
foundation for building up this science. I shall make no effort to prove what I have<br />
said, since … it seems clearer than light itself that such proofs cannot be given,<br />
although a number of experiments show that they are given in actuality.” 111<br />
Besides accounting for the rectilinearity of light rays, he discussed some basic<br />
assumptions of geometrical optics, like the fact that ‘inflections’ take place in<br />
a plane perpendicular to the surface of the ‘inflecting’ medium. Then, in the<br />
second lecture, he moved on to these ‘inflections’ proper, reflection <strong>and</strong><br />
105<br />
Barrow, Lectiones, [26].<br />
106<br />
Barrow, Lectiones, [15-16].<br />
107<br />
Barrow, Lectiones, [15]; (emphasis in original).<br />
108<br />
Barrow, Lectiones, [8, 15].<br />
109<br />
Barrow, Lectiones, [26].<br />
110<br />
Shapiro, “Kinematic optics”, 177-181. Hobbes’ optics is discussed in the next chapter, section 5.2.1.<br />
111 Barrow, Lectiones, [17]