27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 CHAPTER 2<br />

system, Huygens applied<br />

proposition six of book<br />

two. The eye is imagined<br />

at S <strong>and</strong> the object at PN.<br />

In this way the<br />

magnification is<br />

determined by the Figure 13 Diagram for the analysis in Figure 12.<br />

proportion YB : PN. It easily follows that this proportion is equal to AC : EL,<br />

the proportion of the focal distances of the objective <strong>and</strong> the ocular.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In Tractatus, Huygens addressed a specific question: how can the working of<br />

the telescope be understood mathematically? Regarding thin glass lenses his<br />

answers, as we shall see in the next section, were not that new. Yet, he had<br />

arrived at these answers by way of a rigorous mathematical analysis of the<br />

properties of lenses. With the sine law, Huygens derived general <strong>and</strong> exact<br />

theorems regarding the focal distances of thick lenses for both parallel <strong>and</strong><br />

non-parallel rays, irrespective of the material lenses are made of. On the basis<br />

of this exact theory, he showed that these theorems reduce to the familiar,<br />

simpler ones when the thickness of the lens is ignored <strong>and</strong> a specific index of<br />

refraction is chosen. In the same way, he first established a general theorem<br />

regarding the magnification by a lens-system <strong>and</strong> then showed that, in the<br />

cases of actual telescopes, it reduced to the simple <strong>and</strong> familiar one. If the<br />

elaboration of the theory of Tractatus was markedly mathematical, its<br />

rationale was the telescope. Its goal was a ‘theory of the telescope’: an<br />

account of the working of the telescope on the basis of dioptrical theory. In<br />

this sense, the theory of the first two books was almost too elaborate. All in<br />

all, in his Tractatus, Huygens gave a rigorous answer to the question how the<br />

working of the telescope can be understood mathematically.<br />

Huygens was the first one to elaborate a theory of the teleoscope by<br />

means of the exact law of refraction. He knew that his treatise would fill gaps<br />

left by others, in particular Descartes, so we would expect him to publish it<br />

soon. However, as contrasted to other mathematical treatises he published in<br />

this period, he did not press ahead with Tractatus. He inquired with<br />

publishers <strong>and</strong> Van Schooten even proposed to append Huygens’ treatise to<br />

a Latin edition of Descartes’ Discours de la Methode, La Dioptrique <strong>and</strong> Les<br />

Météores, but nothing came of it. 43 Despite repeated announcements between<br />

1655 <strong>and</strong> 1665 that he was publishing Tractatus, Huygens never did. 44<br />

2.2 Dioptrics <strong>and</strong> the telescope<br />

The orientation on the telescope is essential to Tractatus. If Huygens was the<br />

first to apply the sine law to questions regarding the telescope, what had<br />

other students of dioptrics been doing? In this section, I sketch the<br />

43<br />

OC1, 280; 301-303; 321-322. Huygens did not pin much faith in Van Schooten’s proposal.<br />

44<br />

I will say a bit more about his publishing pattern on page 174.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!