Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110 CHAPTER 4<br />
“difficulties against Descartes. where would the acceleration come from. he makes light<br />
a tendency to move [conatus movendi], which makes it difficult to underst<strong>and</strong><br />
refraction as he explains it, at least in my view. … light extends circularly <strong>and</strong> not in an<br />
instant,…” 9<br />
The concluding words reveal Huygens’ own conception: the nature of light is<br />
to spread out circularly over time. In other words, light consists of waves.<br />
The notes also clarify where Huygens had got the idea to think of light as<br />
waves. “Refraction as explained by Pardies.” 10 Ignace-Gaston Pardies was a<br />
Jesuit father with a keen interest in the mathematical sciences, who actively<br />
participated in the Parisian scientific life, <strong>and</strong> with whom Huygens<br />
maintained good relations. Pardies had proposed the idea that light consists<br />
of waves <strong>and</strong> had explained the sine law with it. Huygens listed some<br />
essentials of a wave theory: “transparency without penetration. bodies<br />
capable of this successive movement. Propagation perpendicular to circles.” 11<br />
In the margin he added “vid. micrograph. Hookij”, a reminder to check<br />
Hooke’s alternative wave theory of Micrographia. 12 The original formulation of<br />
Pardies’ theory has been lost, so we cannot know what precisely Huygens<br />
knew of it. He had known of “… the hypothesis of father Pardies …” at<br />
least since August 1669, when he mentioned it in a discussion at the<br />
Académie. 13 On 6 July 1672 Pardies sent him a treatise on refraction that<br />
probably revealed some more details. After Pardies died in 1673, his confrere<br />
Pierre Ango published his explanation of refraction – at least its main lines –<br />
in L’Optique divisée en trois livres (1682). Ango had taken ‘the best parts’ of<br />
Pardies’ theory <strong>and</strong> blended them with own ideas, but Huygens did not have<br />
a high opinion of Ango’s work. 14 We do not know to what exact extent<br />
Huygens knew Pardies’ theory <strong>and</strong> derived his own underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />
nature of light <strong>and</strong> refraction from it. We do know that they stood in close<br />
contact over these matters, that Huygens openly acknowledged the<br />
contributions of Pardies, <strong>and</strong> that the essentials of Pardies’ theory where<br />
central to Huygens’ subsequent attack of strange refraction. He explicitly<br />
recorded the main assumption of Pardies’ derivation of the sine law:<br />
“Propagation perpendicular to circles.” In other words, rays are always<br />
normal to waves. 15<br />
9<br />
OC13, 742. “difficultez contre des Cartes. d’où viendrait l’acceleration. il fait la lumiere un conatus<br />
movendi, selon quoy il est malaisè d’entendre la refraction comme il l’explique, a mon avis au moins. …<br />
lumiere s’estend circulairement et non dans l’instant, …”<br />
10<br />
OC13, 742. “Refraction comment expliquee par Pardies.”<br />
11<br />
OC13, 742. “transparance sans penetration. corps capable de ce mouvement successif. Propagation<br />
perpendiculaire aux cercles.”<br />
12<br />
OC13, 742 note 1.<br />
13<br />
OC16, 184. “… l’hypothese du P. Pardies …” Pardies’ second letter to Newton in their dispute about<br />
colors suggests that Pardies’ wave conception of light was rooted in Grimaldi’s ideas. Shapiro, “Newton’s<br />
definition”, 197.<br />
14<br />
Shapiro, “Kinematic optics”, 209-210. OC10, 203-204.<br />
15<br />
This is discussed below, in section 4.2.2.