27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6<br />

1690 - Traité de la Lumière<br />

Retrospection upon the coming about of the wave theory<br />

in the context of Huygens’ oeuvre<br />

<strong>and</strong> the mathematical sciences in the seventeenth century<br />

Huygens’ new science of optics developed in a markedly contingent way. If<br />

he had not conceived of a plan for the elusive publication of his dioptrics; if<br />

he had not fallen in with the custom of providing some explanation for<br />

refraction; if he had not recognized the problem strange refraction posed for<br />

his Pardies-like explanation of refraction; if he had not decided to include it<br />

in his treatise; if he had not pressed ahead after his investigations of strange<br />

refraction of 1672; <strong>and</strong> if Rømer had not compelled him to devise the special<br />

experiment of 1679. If all this had been otherwise, then his celebrated wave<br />

theory had not come about. In that case, some time, some kind of<br />

‘Dioptrique’ may have been published. As a treatise in geometrical optics it<br />

would hardly have marked itself off from – say – Barrow’s lectures, except<br />

for its practical outlook. But Traité de la Lumière was something different.<br />

What had begun as a fairly conventional, natural philosophical introduction<br />

to a treatise on dioptrics had become a new way of treating light<br />

mathematically that went beyond traditional geometrical optics. We are now<br />

ready to look back <strong>and</strong> ask how the wave theory related to the seventeenthcentury<br />

development of optics <strong>and</strong> of mathematical science in general <strong>and</strong>,<br />

second, what light it sheds on Huygens’ oeuvre.<br />

Traité de la Lumière was not presented by its author as a revolutionary new<br />

way of doing optics. Hypotheses were simply inevitable in these matters,<br />

Huygens said as a matter of fact, <strong>and</strong> he did not draw attention in any way to<br />

the special character of his principle of wave propagation <strong>and</strong> his account of<br />

strange refraction. Did he realize he was breaking new ground? We cannot<br />

read his mind, of course, but there is reason to think that he did not value his<br />

findings in the same vein as we do, as some kind of methodological<br />

innovation, that is. He never ab<strong>and</strong>oned the original plan of 1672, in which<br />

his theory of light would be a preparatory part to his dioptrics. Only at the<br />

very last moment did he ab<strong>and</strong>on his plan to publish a ‘dioptrica’ <strong>and</strong> created<br />

a ‘traité de la lumière’. He published his wave theory in 1690 as Traité de la<br />

Lumière, a title he had chosen at the very last moment. He did so after many<br />

hesitations over the best way to present his wave theory, which suggests that<br />

Huygens himself was also not sure about its exact status.<br />

The publication of the wave theory took no less than twelve years. The<br />

years after its presentation at the Académie witnessed Huygens’ step by step

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!