27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE 'PROJET' OF 1672 129<br />

apply to Cartesian motion proper as well as to tendency to movement. When<br />

a ball rebounds from the surface of an impenetrable body the following<br />

happens. The quantity of its motion is unaffected because it remains moving<br />

through the same medium - the air surrounding the body - <strong>and</strong> only the<br />

direction changes. Regarding the parallel <strong>and</strong> perpendicular components of<br />

the direction, Descartes noted that the body offers resistance only in the<br />

direction perpendicular to its surface. Thus the parallel component is<br />

unaltered.<br />

To determine the path of the<br />

ball after the impact, Descartes<br />

switched to a derivation in which<br />

he graphically mathematized the<br />

assumptions just established<br />

(Figure 41). In circle AFD radius<br />

AB represents the path along<br />

which the ball approaches the<br />

surface where it rebounds from B<br />

in some direction. As the quantity<br />

of motion is constant, the ball<br />

must traverse the same distance<br />

Figure 41 Descartes’ analysis of reflection<br />

after reflection. It thus reaches the circumference of the circle somewhere.<br />

Since the parallel component of its direction is also constant, it follows that<br />

the horizontal distance traversed after reflection must be equal too.<br />

Therefore, BE is equal to BC. Under these conditions the ball can either<br />

arrive at point D or point F on the circle. It cannot penetrate the body below<br />

GE <strong>and</strong> so F is the only option left. “And thus you will easily see how<br />

reflection occurs, namely according to an angle always equal to the one that<br />

is called angle of incidence”, Descartes concluded without much further<br />

ado. 80<br />

Like reflection, refraction is understood as the combined effect on the<br />

quantity <strong>and</strong> the direction of motion. The only difference is that in refraction<br />

the ball penetrates the medium. In other words, it enters a medium of<br />

different density. Therefore the quantity of motion changes. It does so at the<br />

passing of the surface separating both mediums. This can be compared to<br />

smashing a ball through a thin cloth. It loses part of its speed, say half. Again<br />

only the perpendicular component of the direction of the motion is affected<br />

<strong>and</strong> the parallel component remains unaltered. As in the case of reflection,<br />

Descartes switched to a mathematical derivation in the form of a diagram to<br />

determine the exact path of the ball after impact (Figure 40). As a result of<br />

the loss of speed, it takes the ball twice as long to reach the circumference of<br />

the circle after impact at B. However, as its determination to advance parallel<br />

to the surface is unchanged, it moves twice as far to the right in this time.<br />

80 “Et ainsy vous voyés facilement comment se fait la reflexion, a sçavoir selon un angle tousiours esgal a<br />

celuy qu’on nomme l’angle d’incidence.” AT6, 96.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!