Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 95<br />
Newton considered his discovery of different refrangibility an addition to<br />
geometrical optics. A necessary addition because it explained “… how much<br />
the perfection of dioptrics is impeded by this property <strong>and</strong> how that<br />
obstacle, insofar as its nature allows, may be avoided.” 185 These lines could<br />
have been addressed to Huygens personally, had Newton known of De<br />
Aberratione. Newton was aware that he was breaking new ground. In the<br />
letter he sent to Oldenburg he wrote:<br />
“A naturalist would scearce expect to see ye science of [colours] become mathematicall,<br />
& yet I dare affirm that there is as much certainty in it as in any other part of<br />
Opticks.” 186<br />
These lines were, however, omitted when his ‘New theory’ appeared in<br />
Philosophical Transactions. With his theory Newton went beyond the recognized<br />
boundaries of geometrical optics by extending it to the study of colored rays.<br />
Huygens, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, stayed within the established domain of<br />
optical phenomena to be studied mathematically. He elaborated his dioptrical<br />
theories in the manner customary in geometrical optics. As a mathematical<br />
theory, the content of Dioptrica did not deviate in any principal way from the<br />
doctrines found in Aguilón or Barrow. In Paralipomena physical<br />
considerations – albeit within the traditional domain of mathematical optics<br />
– were much more integrated in mathematics, but Huygens did not follow<br />
this line of Kepler at this moment. 187 As a topic of mixed mathematics,<br />
geometrical optics was principally a matter of geometrical deduction. The<br />
difference with ‘pure’ geometry was that lines <strong>and</strong> circles represented<br />
physical objects like rays, reflecting <strong>and</strong> refracting surfaces. Geometrical<br />
inference was preconditioned by a specific set of postulates: the laws of<br />
optics describing the behavior of unimpeded, reflected <strong>and</strong> refracted rays.<br />
Or, as Huygens would state it in Traité de la Lumière, optics is a science<br />
“where geometry is applied to matter.” 188<br />
Huygens ‘géomètre’<br />
Thus Huygens treated spherical aberration as a geometrical problem which<br />
ought to be solved by mathematical analysis. Despite the vital importance of<br />
colors for his project, he did not go beyond the traditional boundaries of<br />
mixed mathematics in order to tackle the problem. He confined his<br />
investigation to effects known to be reducible to the laws of geometry.<br />
Geometrical optics did not provide the means to deal with colors, so he left<br />
them to the craftsman. In this sense Huygens’ Dioptrica fits in with his<br />
mathematical science in general. In his studies of circular motion <strong>and</strong><br />
consonance he also focused on exploring their mathematical properties on<br />
the basis of established (mathematical) principles.<br />
185<br />
Newton, Optical papers 1, 49 & 283.<br />
186<br />
Newton, Correspondence 1, 96.<br />
187<br />
See section 4.1.2.<br />
188<br />
Traité, 1. “… toutes les sciences où la Geometrie est appliquée à la matiere, …”