27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 101<br />

circular motion. He often couched his thoughts on circular motion in some<br />

mechanical form. And he designed several clocks that embodied his<br />

theoretical findings. As regards his original pendulum clock he reaped the<br />

rewards of his study by equipping it with cheeks that gave its bob an<br />

isochronous path.<br />

If instruments did not guide Huygens’ other studies the way they did in<br />

dioptrics, his approach to them was nevertheless similar. Horologium<br />

Oscillatorium of 1673 does not just describe the pendulum clock <strong>and</strong> the ideal<br />

cycloidal path, but also gives the mathematical theory of motion embodied in<br />

it. Going beyond the mere necessities of explaining its mechanical working –<br />

as in Dioptrica – he elaborated his theories of circular motion, evolutes <strong>and</strong><br />

physical pendulums. Of the achievements of 1659, Horologium Oscillatorium<br />

included the study of curvilinear fall <strong>and</strong> cycloidal motion, transformed into<br />

a direct <strong>and</strong> refined derivation, but it listed only the resulting propositions of<br />

his study of circular motion <strong>and</strong> the conical clock. In addition, it contained a<br />

discussion of physical pendulums. Huygens imaginatively applied the insight<br />

that a system of bodies can be considered as a single body concentrated in<br />

the center of gravity, to a physical pendulum considered to be resolved into<br />

its constituent parts independently. With this he could express the motion of<br />

the pendulum by means of the accelerated motion of its parts. Next he<br />

compared the physical pendulum to an isochronous simple pendulum,<br />

deriving an expression for the length of the latter in terms of the length <strong>and</strong><br />

the weights of the parts of the former. 210<br />

His organ likewise rested on an sound <strong>and</strong> even elegant theory of<br />

consonance. In this way he showed the solid theoretical basis on which his<br />

inventions rested, showing at the same time that he was not a mere<br />

empiricist but a learned inventor. 211 De Aberratione st<strong>and</strong>s out among<br />

Huygens’ studies in that he developed theory with the explicit aim of<br />

improving an instrument. Earlier, he had proven the working of his eyepiece<br />

on a mathematical basis, but he had not been able to demonstrate that it was<br />

the best configuration possible. In De Aberratione Huygens set out to design a<br />

configuration of lenses that he could prove mathematically was the best one<br />

possible.<br />

Huygens was not unique for trying to solve a practical problem by means<br />

of theory. Descartes’ a-spherical lenses were meant to serve as a solution to<br />

the same problem Huygens attacked. Descartes had tried to realize his design<br />

by thinking up a device fit for making those lenses. Examples from other<br />

fields can be found without much effort; the problem of finding longitude at<br />

sea is only the first to come to mind. The seventeenth century is pervaded by<br />

scholars who believed theory could or should be of practical use. The special<br />

thing about De Aberratione is the way Huygens set out to solve the problem<br />

of spherical aberration. His starting point consisted of the mathematical<br />

210 Westfall, Force, 165-167.<br />

211 Cohen, Quantifying music, 224.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!