Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 101<br />
circular motion. He often couched his thoughts on circular motion in some<br />
mechanical form. And he designed several clocks that embodied his<br />
theoretical findings. As regards his original pendulum clock he reaped the<br />
rewards of his study by equipping it with cheeks that gave its bob an<br />
isochronous path.<br />
If instruments did not guide Huygens’ other studies the way they did in<br />
dioptrics, his approach to them was nevertheless similar. Horologium<br />
Oscillatorium of 1673 does not just describe the pendulum clock <strong>and</strong> the ideal<br />
cycloidal path, but also gives the mathematical theory of motion embodied in<br />
it. Going beyond the mere necessities of explaining its mechanical working –<br />
as in Dioptrica – he elaborated his theories of circular motion, evolutes <strong>and</strong><br />
physical pendulums. Of the achievements of 1659, Horologium Oscillatorium<br />
included the study of curvilinear fall <strong>and</strong> cycloidal motion, transformed into<br />
a direct <strong>and</strong> refined derivation, but it listed only the resulting propositions of<br />
his study of circular motion <strong>and</strong> the conical clock. In addition, it contained a<br />
discussion of physical pendulums. Huygens imaginatively applied the insight<br />
that a system of bodies can be considered as a single body concentrated in<br />
the center of gravity, to a physical pendulum considered to be resolved into<br />
its constituent parts independently. With this he could express the motion of<br />
the pendulum by means of the accelerated motion of its parts. Next he<br />
compared the physical pendulum to an isochronous simple pendulum,<br />
deriving an expression for the length of the latter in terms of the length <strong>and</strong><br />
the weights of the parts of the former. 210<br />
His organ likewise rested on an sound <strong>and</strong> even elegant theory of<br />
consonance. In this way he showed the solid theoretical basis on which his<br />
inventions rested, showing at the same time that he was not a mere<br />
empiricist but a learned inventor. 211 De Aberratione st<strong>and</strong>s out among<br />
Huygens’ studies in that he developed theory with the explicit aim of<br />
improving an instrument. Earlier, he had proven the working of his eyepiece<br />
on a mathematical basis, but he had not been able to demonstrate that it was<br />
the best configuration possible. In De Aberratione Huygens set out to design a<br />
configuration of lenses that he could prove mathematically was the best one<br />
possible.<br />
Huygens was not unique for trying to solve a practical problem by means<br />
of theory. Descartes’ a-spherical lenses were meant to serve as a solution to<br />
the same problem Huygens attacked. Descartes had tried to realize his design<br />
by thinking up a device fit for making those lenses. Examples from other<br />
fields can be found without much effort; the problem of finding longitude at<br />
sea is only the first to come to mind. The seventeenth century is pervaded by<br />
scholars who believed theory could or should be of practical use. The special<br />
thing about De Aberratione is the way Huygens set out to solve the problem<br />
of spherical aberration. His starting point consisted of the mathematical<br />
210 Westfall, Force, 165-167.<br />
211 Cohen, Quantifying music, 224.