Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 97<br />
phenomena, he reduced them to concepts already mathematized. To be<br />
more specific: Huygens reduced these dynamical phenomena to the<br />
kinematic groundwork laid by Galileo.<br />
Yoder has pointed out Huygens’ talent for transferring physics to<br />
geometry. 198 His proficiency in idealizing phenomena enabled him to<br />
mathematize not only the abstract objects of mechanics but also concrete<br />
bobs <strong>and</strong> cords. Once transformed into a geometrical picture, Huygens<br />
could apply his geometrical skills. Just as in his study of spherical aberration,<br />
the kind of experimentation by which Newton had mathematized colors was<br />
absent from Huygens’ studies of circular motion. He was surely a careful<br />
observer <strong>and</strong> capable of designing clever experiments as an independent<br />
means to test theoretical conclusions. 199 Yet, the precision he achieved in<br />
measuring the constant of gravitational acceleration was made possible by his<br />
mathematical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the matter. Exploring mathematical<br />
properties of a phenomenon empirically was not the way he approached his<br />
objects of study. On the contrary, he readily dismissed Mersenne’s<br />
experiment as indecisive, aware of the imprecision <strong>and</strong> bias of observation. 200<br />
He approached his subject first of all theoretically, interpreting concepts<br />
geometrically <strong>and</strong> analyzing phenomena by means of his mathematical<br />
mastery.<br />
In his dioptrical studies, Huygens had likewise relied on his geometrical<br />
proficiency. His theory of spherical aberration was the outcome of rigorous,<br />
sometimes clever deduction. At the point he could have broken really new<br />
ground – when colors emerged – Huygens halted. The process of<br />
geometrizing new phenomena that had proven to be so fruitful in his study<br />
of motion did not get going in dioptrics. Seemingly, he did not see<br />
possibilities to transform those disturbing colors into a geometrical picture,<br />
despite some promising observations he had made of them. However, we<br />
should bear in mind that motion, as contrasted to colors, had already been<br />
mathematized. In his geometrization of circular motion, Huygens could<br />
build on the groundwork laid by Galileo.<br />
Compared to his study of circular motion, De Aberratione was rather<br />
straightforward geometrical reasoning. In this regard, it comes closer to his<br />
study of consonance that occupied him, on <strong>and</strong> off, from 1661 onwards. 201<br />
The first problem Huygens attacked was the order of consonance, an issue<br />
that had arisen (anew) with the new theories of music of the sixteenth <strong>and</strong><br />
seventeenth centuries. In the theory of consonance Huygens adopted, the<br />
coincidence theory of Mersenne <strong>and</strong> Galileo, the order of consonants was<br />
not evident. He derived a clever rule that only left one problem. His rule<br />
7 seemed to imply that 4 should be placed between the major third <strong>and</strong> the<br />
198 Yoder, Unrolling time, 171-173.<br />
199 Yoder, Unrolling time, 31-32.<br />
200 Yoder, Unrolling time, 170-171.<br />
201 Cohen, Quantifying music, 209-230 <strong>and</strong> Cohen, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> consonance”, 271-301.