Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
108 CHAPTER 4<br />
on dioptrics. Under the heading ‘Projet du Contenu de la Dioptrique’, he<br />
first listed the topics he would discuss <strong>and</strong> then made an outline of the<br />
chapters. 4 The treatise would contain a large part of the dioptrical theory he<br />
had developed since 1653. It would be a comprehensive account of the<br />
refraction of light rays in lenses <strong>and</strong> their configurations. With this, he finally<br />
prepared to give in to the persistent dem<strong>and</strong>s of his correspondents to<br />
publish his dioptrics. He would not be able to present an impressive<br />
innovation, like the cycloïdal pendulum of Horologium Oscillatorium. But also<br />
without the design of a flawless telescope, Huygens had something to offer.<br />
The theory of Tractatus was still worth publishing, despite the fact that<br />
Barrow had gotten ahead of him by publishing the derivation of the focal<br />
distances of spherical lenses from the sine law. A theory elaborating the<br />
dioptrical properties of telescopes was still not available. Huygens had<br />
enough material left to fill up a treatise on dioptrics.<br />
The ‘Projet’ – as I will refer to it – is a key text in the development of<br />
Huygens’ optics. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, it straightened out the remains of his<br />
previous studies of dioptrics. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it pointed a new direction<br />
for his optics that would eventually lead to the Traité de la Lumière. This<br />
direction was sign-posted by two new topics the ‘Projet’ introduced to<br />
Huygens’ optics. First, the treatise would contain a chapter on the nature of<br />
light. Huygens planned to give an explanation of the sine law of refraction in<br />
terms of waves of light. Secondly, he would discuss an optical phenomenon<br />
recently discovered: the strange refraction of Icel<strong>and</strong> crystal. The topic bears<br />
no relevance whatsoever to the questions about telescopes that had occupied<br />
him in his previous dioptrical studies. The reason for treating strange<br />
refraction was that it posed a problem for the kind of explanation of the sine<br />
law he had in mind. All this is remarkable, for in his dioptrics Huygens had<br />
never before bothered about the nature of light or the cause of refraction.<br />
What is more, in his recent dispute with Newton, he appeared to have a<br />
blind spot for these very subjects.<br />
In this chapter, we follow Huygens’ switch from the mathematical<br />
analysis of the behavior of refracted rays to the consideration of its causes<br />
<strong>and</strong> the explanation of optical laws. The issue of causes became relevant for<br />
Huygens through the phenomenon of strange refraction. The first attack of<br />
the problem was inconclusive <strong>and</strong>, moreover, left the issue of the cause of<br />
refraction untouched. Together, this attack <strong>and</strong> the ‘Projet’ are illuminating,<br />
not only for the development of Huygens’ optics <strong>and</strong> his conception of<br />
mathematical science, but also for seventeenth-century optics in general.<br />
Optics was in the middle of a transition from medieval ‘perspectiva’ to new<br />
way of dealing mathematically with phenomena of light. This chapter focuses<br />
on the issue of causes <strong>and</strong> explanations in optics. Over the shoulder of<br />
Huygens we look back to the way Alhacen, Kepler, Descartes dealt with the<br />
4<br />
OC13, 738-745. I date the sketch in 1672, instead of 1673 as the editors of Oeuvres Complètes have it. See<br />
page 92 above <strong>and</strong> page 140 below.