27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1653 - TRACTATUS 43<br />

exact description of the universe. 119 After all, the telescope was an artful<br />

means to reveal new things in the heavens, whereas astronomical<br />

measurement instruments aided the naked eye. 120 The step to combine these<br />

two by aiding the artificial eyes with quadrants <strong>and</strong> the like, was not taken<br />

immediately. Around the middle of the century, astronomical measurements<br />

were still made by using the pre-telescopic methods <strong>and</strong> instruments<br />

developed by Tycho Brahe. Hevelius used telescopes extensively to study the<br />

surface of the Moon, but he turned to open-sight instruments when making<br />

measurements. Efforts had been made to use the telescope for<br />

measurements, but in vain. Until the 1670s, the accuracy of telescopic<br />

observations was determined by the acuity of the human eye. But then<br />

change set in. With the introduction of the micrometer, the telescope was<br />

transformed into an instrument of precision. Significantly, the men closely<br />

involved in that development were the ones to seek a more precise account<br />

of the working of the telescope.<br />

The configuration Kepler had thought up in 1611 had the drawback that<br />

it reversed the image. Given the quality of lenses made at that time, it was<br />

not advisable to add a third lens to re-erect the image. The two-lens<br />

Keplerian telescope was therefore used only to project images, whereas the<br />

Galilean type continued to be used for direct observation. In the course of<br />

time the first advantage of Kepler’s configuration was discovered: its wider<br />

field of view. When the length of a Galilean telescope is increased the field<br />

of view quickly diminishes, which makes it very difficult to use. Towards the<br />

1640s, the Keplerian telescope was gaining ground, in particular through the<br />

good craftsmanship of telescope makers like Fontana in Naples <strong>and</strong> Wiesel<br />

in Augsburg. 121 At some point in the early 1640s, the second advantage of<br />

this type was discovered by the Lancashire astronomer William Gascoigne.<br />

The Keplerian configuration has a positive focus inside the telescope; an<br />

object inserted into it will cast a sharp shadow over the object seen through<br />

the tube. Gascoigne relates that he discovered this by accident after a spider<br />

had spun its web in his telescope. 122 Inserting some kind of ruler makes it<br />

possible to make measurements of telescopic images. He died in 1644,<br />

before he could publish his discovery <strong>and</strong> his measurements of the diameters<br />

of planets. 123<br />

Gascoigne’s accomplishments were made public in 1667 when Richard<br />

Towneley, backed by Christopher Wren <strong>and</strong> Robert Hooke, claimed British<br />

priority for the invention of the micrometer. This happened after a letter of<br />

119 Van Helden, Measure, 118-119.<br />

120 Compare Dear, Discipline <strong>and</strong> Experience, 210-216.<br />

121 Van Helden, “Astronomical telescope”, 26-32. See also below section 3.1.1.<br />

122 Rigaud, Correspondence, 46: “This is that admirable secret, which, as all other things, appeared when it<br />

pleased the All Disposer, at whose direction a spider’s line drawn in an opened case could first give me by<br />

its perfect apparition, when I was with two convexes trying experiments about the sun, the unexpected<br />

knowledge.”<br />

123 McKeon, “Les débuts I”, 258-266.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!