Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1653 - TRACTATUS 43<br />
exact description of the universe. 119 After all, the telescope was an artful<br />
means to reveal new things in the heavens, whereas astronomical<br />
measurement instruments aided the naked eye. 120 The step to combine these<br />
two by aiding the artificial eyes with quadrants <strong>and</strong> the like, was not taken<br />
immediately. Around the middle of the century, astronomical measurements<br />
were still made by using the pre-telescopic methods <strong>and</strong> instruments<br />
developed by Tycho Brahe. Hevelius used telescopes extensively to study the<br />
surface of the Moon, but he turned to open-sight instruments when making<br />
measurements. Efforts had been made to use the telescope for<br />
measurements, but in vain. Until the 1670s, the accuracy of telescopic<br />
observations was determined by the acuity of the human eye. But then<br />
change set in. With the introduction of the micrometer, the telescope was<br />
transformed into an instrument of precision. Significantly, the men closely<br />
involved in that development were the ones to seek a more precise account<br />
of the working of the telescope.<br />
The configuration Kepler had thought up in 1611 had the drawback that<br />
it reversed the image. Given the quality of lenses made at that time, it was<br />
not advisable to add a third lens to re-erect the image. The two-lens<br />
Keplerian telescope was therefore used only to project images, whereas the<br />
Galilean type continued to be used for direct observation. In the course of<br />
time the first advantage of Kepler’s configuration was discovered: its wider<br />
field of view. When the length of a Galilean telescope is increased the field<br />
of view quickly diminishes, which makes it very difficult to use. Towards the<br />
1640s, the Keplerian telescope was gaining ground, in particular through the<br />
good craftsmanship of telescope makers like Fontana in Naples <strong>and</strong> Wiesel<br />
in Augsburg. 121 At some point in the early 1640s, the second advantage of<br />
this type was discovered by the Lancashire astronomer William Gascoigne.<br />
The Keplerian configuration has a positive focus inside the telescope; an<br />
object inserted into it will cast a sharp shadow over the object seen through<br />
the tube. Gascoigne relates that he discovered this by accident after a spider<br />
had spun its web in his telescope. 122 Inserting some kind of ruler makes it<br />
possible to make measurements of telescopic images. He died in 1644,<br />
before he could publish his discovery <strong>and</strong> his measurements of the diameters<br />
of planets. 123<br />
Gascoigne’s accomplishments were made public in 1667 when Richard<br />
Towneley, backed by Christopher Wren <strong>and</strong> Robert Hooke, claimed British<br />
priority for the invention of the micrometer. This happened after a letter of<br />
119 Van Helden, Measure, 118-119.<br />
120 Compare Dear, Discipline <strong>and</strong> Experience, 210-216.<br />
121 Van Helden, “Astronomical telescope”, 26-32. See also below section 3.1.1.<br />
122 Rigaud, Correspondence, 46: “This is that admirable secret, which, as all other things, appeared when it<br />
pleased the All Disposer, at whose direction a spider’s line drawn in an opened case could first give me by<br />
its perfect apparition, when I was with two convexes trying experiments about the sun, the unexpected<br />
knowledge.”<br />
123 McKeon, “Les débuts I”, 258-266.