Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
46 CHAPTER 2<br />
were convinced that the new optical devices were useful. The telescopic sight<br />
<strong>and</strong> the micrometer, together with the pendulum clock, brought about a<br />
revolution in positional astronomy between 1665 <strong>and</strong> 1680. 137 In dioptrics it<br />
raised the question of the exact properties of lenses anew.<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the telescope<br />
Apart from the practical problems of mounting <strong>and</strong> aligning, the theoretical<br />
problem of the working of the telescope now became a matter of sustained<br />
interest. As a result of his discussion with Hevelius over the reliability of<br />
telescopic sights, Flamsteed realized that a theoretical justification of his<br />
claims was also needed: “… to prove that optick glasses did not impose<br />
upon or senses. then to shew that they might be applyed to instruments &<br />
rectified as well as plaine sights.” 138 His chance to elaborate a dioptrical<br />
account of the telescope came in the early 1680s, when, appointed Gresham<br />
professor of Astronomy, he could deliver a series of lectures on astronomy.<br />
In these lectures, he discussed instruments <strong>and</strong> their use at length <strong>and</strong><br />
included an account of dioptrics.<br />
“Yet such has beene the fault of or time that hitherto very little materiall on this subject<br />
has been published in or language. [Tho severall learned persons have done well<br />
concerning opticks in ye latine Tongue. Yet how glasses may be applyed to instruments<br />
& how the faults commonly committed in theire applycation might be amended or<br />
rather shund & how all the difficultys suggested by ingenious persons who had not the<br />
good to underst<strong>and</strong> them aright might be avoyded the best authors of Dioptricks have<br />
been hitherto silent. … I shall therefore make it my businesse in this & my following<br />
lectures of this terme fully to explain the Nature of telescopes the reason of their<br />
performances, how they may be applyed to Levells, Quadrants, & Sextants. & how the<br />
instruments furnished with them may be so rectified & adjusted that they may be free<br />
from all suspicion of errors]” 139<br />
Flamsteed began with a discussion of the focal distances of convex lenses. It<br />
has two notable features. First, he took the consequences of Newton’s<br />
theory of colors into account by pointing out the chromatic aberration of<br />
lenses. Second, the paucity of his demonstrations shows that he was not an<br />
outst<strong>and</strong>ing geometer. 140 By means of the sine law, he calculated the<br />
refraction of single rays numerically <strong>and</strong> then compared the result with the<br />
Keplerian rules for focal distances of a bundle of rays. By calculating<br />
spherical aberration he discovered – as Huygens had done earlier – that the<br />
aberration of a plano-convex lens varies considerably depending on which<br />
side is turned towards the incident rays. He gave only a qualitative account of<br />
chromatic abberation. On this basis he argued that only telescopes consisting<br />
of two convex lenses are useful in astronomy, because these admit the<br />
137<br />
Van Helden, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> the astronomers”, 156-157; Van Helden, Measure, 127-129.<br />
138<br />
Flamsteed, Gresham lectures, 154.<br />
139<br />
Flamsteed, Gresham lectures, 119 & 132. Flamsteed later deleted the part between brackets.<br />
140 Flamsteed, Gresham lectures, 120-127.