27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 CHAPTER 3<br />

Huygens supposed that the circle of aberration XV of a lens system is<br />

mainly produced by the objective lens AB (Figure 31). The ocular lens PO<br />

barely increases the diameter of the circle <strong>and</strong> could therefore be considered<br />

to have a perfect focus. He considered the opening BC of the objective lens<br />

required to maintain a constant circle of aberration when the focal distance<br />

CD of this lens is changed. He proved that the proportion CD 3 : CB 4 should<br />

remain constant. 100 Finally, the quality of images will be maintained upon<br />

changing the ocular lens, when the proportion OD : 4 CD between the focal<br />

distances of both lenses is maintained. 101 Again, Huygens converted these<br />

proportions into a table of numerical values, listing the optimal values of the<br />

focal distances of both lenses <strong>and</strong> the opening of the objective, as well as the<br />

resulting magnification of the system. 102 This table concluded De Aberratione.<br />

Huygens’ theoretical accomplishments in De Aberratione are beyond dispute.<br />

Like the theory of focal distances <strong>and</strong> magnification of Tractatus, his theory<br />

of spherical aberration was rigorous <strong>and</strong> general. And again his theoretical<br />

studies were aimed at underst<strong>and</strong>ing the telescope; in this case, at<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing how a system of lenses produces spherical aberration.<br />

Huygens could claim that he understood why an opening of such-<strong>and</strong>-such<br />

dimensions maintained the quality of images.<br />

His results were couched in two tables listing the required components to<br />

make these optimal systems, in a way quite comparable to the ones found in<br />

Bolantio’s manuscript. They prescribed how to assemble a telescope without<br />

presupposing theoretical knowledge of dioptrics. The difference is that<br />

Huygens’ tables were derived from his mathematical theory of lenses instead<br />

of a record of experiential knowledge. The table prescribing the aperture of<br />

telescopes was not gained by some implicit rule of thumb, but was based on<br />

an explicit theorem derived from dioptrical properties of lenses. Huygens<br />

could prove that the openings he prescribed were optimal. Whether this<br />

worked in practice remains to be seen. At least he could claim that he could<br />

calculate beforeh<strong>and</strong> how to adjust the components of a telescope when its<br />

length was changed, thus avoiding a renewed process of trial-<strong>and</strong>-error.<br />

Huygens had realized the goal of De Aberratione. He had demonstrated<br />

that the aberrations of spherical lenses could be made to cancel out.<br />

100 OC13, 342-345.<br />

101 OC13, 348-351.<br />

102 OC13, 350-353.<br />

Figure 31 Aberration produced by a Keplerian configuration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!