27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1690 - TRAITÉ DE LA LUMIÈRE 253<br />

Some ambivalence resounds in the judgements of men like Laplace <strong>and</strong><br />

Lagrange. Huygens brought the science of motion to a new level, but did not<br />

develop this into a new science like Newton. 144<br />

By the end of the eighteenth century Huygens’ investigation of strange<br />

refraction underwent a more positive valuation. However, his natural<br />

philosophical ideas met with doubts. In his Exposition du système du Monde of<br />

1796 Laplace observed:<br />

“ … [the insufficient explanation of spheroidal waves <strong>and</strong> polarization] combined with<br />

the difficulties the theory of luminous waves presents is the cause why Newton <strong>and</strong> the<br />

majority of geometers who have followed him failed to appreciate with justice the law<br />

Huygens attached to it.” 145<br />

Malus praised Huygens for finding an accurate law of strange refraction, but<br />

lamented his troublesome ‘system of undulations’:<br />

“That law, considered in itself <strong>and</strong> cleared of the explanation to which Huygens had<br />

attached it is one of the finest discoveries of that celebrated geometer.” 146<br />

He did not realize that this troublesome system was essential to the discovery<br />

of the law <strong>and</strong> was inherently connected to it. 147 He did not recognize the<br />

new way of studying light mathematically that was being pursued in Traité de<br />

la Lumière. His physical optics still had to be rediscovered. Nineteenthcentury<br />

students like Fresnel developed a Huygens-like way of doing optics<br />

in which microphysical hypotheses were the starting point of the<br />

investigation – a way Huygens himself had barely recognized as a kind of<br />

‘Optique’ that went beyond geometrical optics.<br />

144 Bachelard, “Influence”, 244-247.<br />

145 Laplace, Oeuvres Complètes 6, 353-354. “… joint aux difficultés que présente la théorie des ondes<br />

lumineuses est la cause pour laquelle Newton et la plupart des géomètres qui l’ont suivi n’ont pas<br />

justement apprécié la loi qu’Huygens y avait attachée.”<br />

146 Malus, Theorie de la double réfraction…, 289-290. “Cette loi, considérée en elle-même et débarrassée de<br />

l’explication à laquelle Huygens l’avait attachée, est une des plus belles découvertes de ce célèbre<br />

géomètre.”<br />

147 The eighteenth-century development of mechanics, in which mathematical science <strong>and</strong> natural<br />

philosophy tacitly drifted apart, is illuminating in this regard. See Boudri, Het mechanische van de mechanica, in<br />

particular 257-265.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!