27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1677-1679 –WAVES OF LIGHT 177<br />

He began with a qualitative<br />

account of spheroidal waves<br />

produced by a perpendicularly<br />

incident wave (Figure 67). 50 RC is<br />

part of a plane wave incident<br />

perpendicularly on the surface AB<br />

of the crystal, so that all points<br />

RHhhC arrive in AKkkB at the<br />

same time. Suppose spheroidal<br />

wavelets SVT spread around these<br />

points, as the speed of<br />

propagation in the direction AV is<br />

larger than in the direction AZ.<br />

According to Huygens’ principle<br />

the common tangent of these spheroidal waves is the refracted wave.<br />

“And it is thus that I have comprehended, what had seemed to me very difficult, how a<br />

ray perpendicular to a surface could suffer refraction on entering the transparent body;<br />

seeing that the wave RC, having come to the aperture AB, continued forward thence,<br />

extending between the parallels AN, BQ yet itself remaining always parallel to AB, such<br />

that here the light does not extend along lines perpendicular to its waves, as in ordinary<br />

refraction, but these lines cut the waves obliquely.” 51<br />

Figure 67 Refraction of the perpendicular.<br />

Thus the application of Huygens’ principle applied to spheroidal waves<br />

showed that these could explain the refracted perpendicular. Huygens had<br />

solved the original problem of strange refraction, as the refracted<br />

perpendicular implied that waves would not be at right angles to the line of<br />

their extension. Strange refraction was strange precisely because of this: the<br />

propagation of light in Icel<strong>and</strong> crystal is extraordinary <strong>and</strong> produces waves<br />

that are not normal to rays.<br />

At this point in the Traité de la Lumière the problem was solved, but only<br />

in principle. For Huygens the most important question still had to be<br />

answered: how spheroidal waves could explain strange refraction. The answer,<br />

the exact properties of the spheroid, was that of 6 August 1677.<br />

In Traité de la Lumière, he began with observing that in the principal<br />

sections of each face of the crystal (the dotted lines in Figure 68) strange<br />

refraction behaves the same. Consequently, the spheroid must have the same<br />

section in all three planes. This is so when the axis of the spheroid is also the<br />

axis of the obtuse solid angle C of the crystal. Choosing plane GCF, Huygens<br />

drew the ellipse PSG, the cross-section of the spheroid around center C<br />

(Figure 69). CS is the axis of the obtuse solid angle C as well as the axis of<br />

50 Traité, 60-62.<br />

51 Traité, 61-62. “Et c’est ainsi que j’ay compris, ce qui m’avoit paru fort difficile, comment un rayon<br />

perpendiculaire à une surface pouvoit souffrir refraction en entrant dans le corps transparent; voyant que<br />

l’onde RC, estant venue à l’ouverture AB, continuoit de là en avant à s’étendre entre les paralleles AN, BQ<br />

demeurant pourtant elle mesme tousiours parallele à AB, de sorte qu’icy la lumiere ne s’étend pas par des<br />

lignes perpendiculaires à ses ondes, comme dans la refraction ordinaire, mais ces lignes coupent les ondes<br />

obliquement.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!