27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 55<br />

chapter examines these themes in a broader context of the scientific<br />

revolution, <strong>and</strong> forms a conclusion of this account of Huygens’ dioptrics<br />

prior to the metamorphosis of his optics discussed in the subsequent<br />

chapters. So much can be said that Huygens’ passion was with the<br />

instrument, not its employment. For Huygens telescopic astronomy was a<br />

pastime rather than a full-time job. Although he had solved the puzzle of<br />

Saturn’s bulges by systematic observation, this never became his vocation.<br />

His fascination was with its design <strong>and</strong> manufacture of telescopes. 8 To this<br />

we may also count his interest in dioptrical theory, being a means of<br />

tinkering with the instrument <strong>and</strong> contemplating its workings.<br />

In the ten or so years after 1653 when the brothers engaged in practical<br />

pursuits, Huygens did not work on dioptrical theory (at least no traces ar<br />

left). During the 1660s he returned to theory <strong>and</strong> set out for what should<br />

have been the crowning glory of his dioptrical work: the design of a<br />

telescope in which spherical aberration was nullified. Not by means of<br />

imaginary lenses of the kind Descartes had thought up, but by means of<br />

actual spherical lenses. In the design came together Huygens’ theoretical<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> practical experience with lenses <strong>and</strong> it brought him closer<br />

to bridging the gap between theory <strong>and</strong> practice than any other in the<br />

seventeenth century. Newton’s ‘New Theory’ of colors eventually<br />

shipwrecked the project. Newton’s approach of mathematical optics<br />

essentially differed from Huygens’. These differences shed light on the<br />

character of the Huygens’ dioptrics <strong>and</strong> may explain why Huygens did not<br />

manage to bridge the said gap completely.<br />

3.1 The use of theory<br />

Around 1600, spectacle makers had advanced their art far enough to enable<br />

the discovery of the telescopic effect. 9 Astronomers in their turn discovered<br />

the possibilities of this chance invention. Their pursuit dem<strong>and</strong>ed far greater<br />

power than the first spyglasses offered. They needed skillful h<strong>and</strong>s:<br />

sometimes their own, but usually those of a craftsman. Galileo, not<br />

particularly all fingers <strong>and</strong> thumbs himself, had the advantage of living close<br />

to Venice, the center of European glass industry. After the success of Sidereus<br />

nuncius he established a workshop for telescopes. Simon Marius, in Germany,<br />

was less lucky: he had great trouble finding a good lens maker <strong>and</strong> could not<br />

put the new invention to fruitful use. 10 During the first half of the<br />

seventeenth century, the manufacture of telescopes for astronomy developed<br />

into a small trade of specialized craftsmen. This section will not treat the<br />

history of lens <strong>and</strong> telescope manufacture, it focuses on the relationship<br />

between dioptrical theory <strong>and</strong> the art of telescope making. Central questions<br />

are: to what extent was theoretical knowledge used in practical dioptrics, if it<br />

8<br />

Van Helden, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> the astronomers” 148, 157-158.<br />

9<br />

Van Helden, Invention, 16-20.<br />

10<br />

Van Helden, Invention, 26; 47-48.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!