27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 CHAPTER 3<br />

discovered since Galileo. 2 The tract ended with an anagram holding<br />

Huygens’ second discovery: the true nature of the inexplicable appearance of<br />

Saturn. Three years later, he elaborated his explanation in Systema saturnium.<br />

The strange attachments to the planet that disappeared from time to time<br />

were manifestations of a solid ring around the planet. 3<br />

He owed much to his instruments, Huygens wrote in Systema saturnium.<br />

He prided himself on his practical skills of telescope making <strong>and</strong> claimed that<br />

his success proved the unmatched quality of his telescopes. Van Helden<br />

explains that his discovery owed at least as much to his talents for<br />

geometrical <strong>and</strong> physical reasoning. 4 Initially, Huygens had used a 12-foot<br />

telescope of their own make. After a trip to Paris, where he probably<br />

discussed his observations, the brothers built a new, 23-foot telescope which<br />

he started using in February 1656. 5 He illustrated the difference between<br />

both pieces in Systema saturnium (Figure 21). Everyone could see for himself<br />

that Huygens could hold his own with the best of telescope makers. At least,<br />

that is how he saw it himself. His boasting offended Eustachio Divini in<br />

Rome, who saw his fame of being the best telescope maker in Europe<br />

challenged. In 1660 he published Brevis annotatio in systema saturnium, disputing<br />

the observational results as well as Huygens’ claims regarding his<br />

instruments. 6 The tract was actually written by the Roman astronomer Fabri.<br />

In the ensuing dispute Divini/Fabri were no match for Huygens, at least not<br />

as regards the structure of the system of Saturn. 7<br />

Figure 21 Observations of Saturn with the 12- <strong>and</strong> a 23-foot telescope.<br />

The dispute itself is less interesting than the fact that Huygens did not feel<br />

above at entering a dispute with a craftsman. It raises questions about the<br />

relationship between his theoretical <strong>and</strong> his practical pursuits, how he valued<br />

his mathematical expertise <strong>and</strong> his skilful craftsmanship. The last part of this<br />

2<br />

Huygens did not name it, he called it ‘saturni luna’ <strong>and</strong> sometimes ‘comes meus’. The name Titan was<br />

given by Herschel in 1847.<br />

3<br />

OC15, 296-299.<br />

4<br />

Van Helden, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> the astronomers”, 150-154. Van Helden, “Divini vs Huygens”, 48-50.<br />

5<br />

OC15, 177; 230. Huygens employed Rhinel<strong>and</strong> feet (0,3139 meters) <strong>and</strong> inches (0,026 meters).<br />

6<br />

It is reprinted in OC15, 403-437.<br />

7<br />

Van Helden, “Divini vs Huygens”, 36-40.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!