Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
54 CHAPTER 3<br />
discovered since Galileo. 2 The tract ended with an anagram holding<br />
Huygens’ second discovery: the true nature of the inexplicable appearance of<br />
Saturn. Three years later, he elaborated his explanation in Systema saturnium.<br />
The strange attachments to the planet that disappeared from time to time<br />
were manifestations of a solid ring around the planet. 3<br />
He owed much to his instruments, Huygens wrote in Systema saturnium.<br />
He prided himself on his practical skills of telescope making <strong>and</strong> claimed that<br />
his success proved the unmatched quality of his telescopes. Van Helden<br />
explains that his discovery owed at least as much to his talents for<br />
geometrical <strong>and</strong> physical reasoning. 4 Initially, Huygens had used a 12-foot<br />
telescope of their own make. After a trip to Paris, where he probably<br />
discussed his observations, the brothers built a new, 23-foot telescope which<br />
he started using in February 1656. 5 He illustrated the difference between<br />
both pieces in Systema saturnium (Figure 21). Everyone could see for himself<br />
that Huygens could hold his own with the best of telescope makers. At least,<br />
that is how he saw it himself. His boasting offended Eustachio Divini in<br />
Rome, who saw his fame of being the best telescope maker in Europe<br />
challenged. In 1660 he published Brevis annotatio in systema saturnium, disputing<br />
the observational results as well as Huygens’ claims regarding his<br />
instruments. 6 The tract was actually written by the Roman astronomer Fabri.<br />
In the ensuing dispute Divini/Fabri were no match for Huygens, at least not<br />
as regards the structure of the system of Saturn. 7<br />
Figure 21 Observations of Saturn with the 12- <strong>and</strong> a 23-foot telescope.<br />
The dispute itself is less interesting than the fact that Huygens did not feel<br />
above at entering a dispute with a craftsman. It raises questions about the<br />
relationship between his theoretical <strong>and</strong> his practical pursuits, how he valued<br />
his mathematical expertise <strong>and</strong> his skilful craftsmanship. The last part of this<br />
2<br />
Huygens did not name it, he called it ‘saturni luna’ <strong>and</strong> sometimes ‘comes meus’. The name Titan was<br />
given by Herschel in 1847.<br />
3<br />
OC15, 296-299.<br />
4<br />
Van Helden, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> the astronomers”, 150-154. Van Helden, “Divini vs Huygens”, 48-50.<br />
5<br />
OC15, 177; 230. Huygens employed Rhinel<strong>and</strong> feet (0,3139 meters) <strong>and</strong> inches (0,026 meters).<br />
6<br />
It is reprinted in OC15, 403-437.<br />
7<br />
Van Helden, “Divini vs Huygens”, 36-40.