27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1677-1679 –WAVES OF LIGHT 187<br />

Descartes presented his tendency theory of light in Le Monde (written<br />

1630-1632, published posthumously in 1664) <strong>and</strong> Principia Philosophiae<br />

(written 1641-1644, published 1644). Light was central in his system of<br />

natural philosophy, the nature of light being ultimately connected with the<br />

essence of the cosmos. The full title of Le Monde was Le Monde ou Traité de la<br />

Lumière. Descartes envisaged a system of natural philosophy founded solely<br />

on mathematical principles. 74 Quantity was the only thing to be investigated<br />

about material substance <strong>and</strong> it was subject to the laws of motion. According<br />

to Descartes, the cosmos is completely filled with matter, which is manifest<br />

in three kinds or elements. The third element, composed of the bulkiest<br />

parts, constitutes the visible objects around us, like the earth, the planets <strong>and</strong><br />

comets. The first <strong>and</strong> finest element makes the Sun <strong>and</strong> the stars; the second<br />

consists of spherical particles <strong>and</strong> makes the heavens. 75 All three elements<br />

have their share in the explanation of light: the bodies of the first element<br />

produce light, the second element makes up the medium that propagates it,<br />

<strong>and</strong> reflecting <strong>and</strong> refracting bodies are made of the third element. Descartes<br />

argued that the Sun <strong>and</strong> Stars, in rotating about their axes, exert a radial<br />

tendency (‘conatus’) upon the Heavens which instantaneously spreads<br />

outward along straight lines. This tendency is light, <strong>and</strong> Descartes explained<br />

its properties in a discussion of circular motion. 76<br />

In Traité de la Lumière Huygens did not waste his breath on the tendency<br />

theory. He only mentions it once, to reject it on the basis of just one<br />

argument:<br />

“… [Descartes] has light consist in a continual pressure, that only tends to movement.<br />

As this pressure cannot act at once from two opposing sides, against bodies that have<br />

no inclination whatsoever to approach, it is impossible to comprehend what I have just<br />

said of two persons who mutually see each others’ eyes, nor how two flambeaus can<br />

illuminate each other.” 77<br />

Huygens did not bother to criticize the mechanistic underpinnings of the<br />

tendency theory in detail. Although we can figure that Huygens would reject<br />

the ‘raisons de mechanique’ employed, he regarded instantaneous<br />

propagation as the decisive problem of the theory. It returns unremittingly<br />

whenever mention is made of Descartes. To Huygens the speed of light was<br />

necessarily finite.<br />

74 Descartes, Principles, [76].<br />

75 Descartes, Principles, [110].<br />

76 Descartes, Principles, [111-118]. For a detailed discussion see: Shapiro, “Light, pressure”, 243-266.<br />

77 Traité, 20. “… Descartes, qui fait consister la lumiere dans une pression continuelle, qui ne fait que<br />

tendre au mouvement. Car cette pression ne pouvant agir tout à la fois des deux costez opposez, contre<br />

des corps qui n’ont aucune inclination à s’approcher; il est impossible de comprendre ce que je viens de<br />

dire de deux personnes qui se voyent les yeux mutuellement, ni comment deux flambeaux se puissent<br />

éclairer l’un l’autre.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!