27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

Conclusion: <strong>Lenses</strong> & <strong>Waves</strong><br />

A sketch of Huygens in the light of his optics<br />

This study has been aimed at finding out the coming into being of Traité de la<br />

Lumière. How did Huygens’ work in optics develop into the wave theory of<br />

light, a new way of doing optics in which the laws of optics are derived from<br />

an experimentally confirmed, mathematized theory of the mechanistic nature<br />

of light?<br />

Huygens’ work in optics comprises in the first place his dioptrical studies,<br />

but these have hardly been taken into account by historians. Dioptrica has<br />

very little been studied historically <strong>and</strong> its potential relevance for<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing Traité de la Lumière has not been considered previously.<br />

Huygens’ optics tends to be identified with his wave theory <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mechanistic reasoning in it is often taken as a natural part of his science. Yet,<br />

little in Huygens’ work in optics prior to 1672 gives reason to suspect that he<br />

would have given a new form to mechanistic science by 1679. Taking<br />

Dioptrica into account while discussing the development of Huygens’ optics<br />

raises a historical problem. The kind of theorizing pursued in Traité de la<br />

Lumière is completely absent from Dioptrica. Generally speaking, Huygens<br />

does not appear to have had a particular interest in mechanistic topics prior<br />

to the 1670s. The Huygens of Dioptrica was a seventeenth-century<br />

mathematician who does not at all resemble the alleged, ‘first thoroughgoing<br />

Cartesian’ of Traité de la Lumière.<br />

What I wish to do now, is to forget about Huygens’ Cartesianism for a<br />

while <strong>and</strong> focus on the Huygens of Dioptrica. By comparing his pursuits in<br />

dioptrics to those of his precursors <strong>and</strong> contemporaries a picture has arisen<br />

of a mathematician with an idiosyncratic approach to questions of<br />

mathematical theory. I shall generalize this picture to include his pursuits in<br />

other fields <strong>and</strong> make a sketch of his scientific persona. Only then shall I ask<br />

how Traité de la Lumière may fit in <strong>and</strong> how we should assess his alleged<br />

Cartesianism.<br />

A seventeenth-century Archimedes<br />

The Huygens who went to Paris in 1666 pursued the various branches of the<br />

mathematical sciences: geometry, arithmetic, statics, optics, harmonics, some<br />

astronomy, <strong>and</strong> the study of motions. He pursued these brilliantly, <strong>and</strong><br />

marked himself off by a particular sense of practical possibilities. Huygens’<br />

orientation on instruments in Dioptrica was unique for its day, having his<br />

theoretical investigations guided by questions of practical relevance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!