27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 59<br />

technique used by mirror-makers. 28 It is<br />

not known where Huygens got the idea.<br />

Such tools for improving the<br />

grinding process had been thought up<br />

earlier, in particular by the most<br />

prestigious lens makers. In Galileo’s<br />

workshop – reigning until the 1640s – a<br />

lathe was introduced that permitted<br />

greater precision than was attained by<br />

ordinary spectacle makers. 29 During the<br />

1660s, the Campani brothers in Rome<br />

became the undisputed masters of the<br />

art. They used a range of machines of<br />

their own design, producing lenses<br />

unsurpassed until the eighteenth<br />

century. The Huygens brothers kept a<br />

close eye on developments like these <strong>and</strong> around 1665 references to a type of<br />

lathe designed by Campani turned up in their writings. The quality of lenses<br />

seems to have depended to some degree on the lens maker’s inventiveness to<br />

convert laborious <strong>and</strong> unsteady h<strong>and</strong>iwork into reliable tools.<br />

Huygens had learned how to make lenses. He knew the limitations of the<br />

art <strong>and</strong> of its products. Even the best lenses might suffer from flaws like<br />

bubbles, irregular density, faults in shape, etcetera. In the end, the proof of<br />

the pudding was in the eating. The quality of telescopes was determined by<br />

trial, sometimes literally. Campani beat Divini early 1664 by a series of<br />

carefully organized ‘paragoni’: open contests in which printed sheets at a<br />

distance were read by means of the instruments of both competitors. 30<br />

Figure 22 Beam to facilitate lens grinding.<br />

Alternative configurations<br />

Besides the quality of lenses, telescopes could be improved by configuring<br />

lenses alternatively. Kepler could not have known that the configuration of<br />

two convex lenses he discussed in Dioptrice had several advantages over the<br />

Galilean one. The positive focus that made possible the micrometer has<br />

already been discussed in the previous chapter. Scheiner, who used a<br />

Keplerian telescope to project images of the sun, discovered by coincidence<br />

that it had a wider field of view. There are indications that Fontana was the<br />

first to put Kepler’s idea into practice, although Scheiner was the first to<br />

mention using it. 31 Around 1640 Fontana was the first to challenge Galileo’s<br />

dominance in the trade <strong>and</strong> he did so with Keplerian telescopes. Around that<br />

time, the Galilean configuration was beginning to reach the limits to which<br />

its power could be increased without the field of view becoming too small.<br />

28<br />

Beeckman, Journal, III, 232.<br />

29<br />

Bedini, “Makers”, 108-110; Bedini, “Lens making”, 688-691.<br />

30<br />

Bonelli, “Divini <strong>and</strong> Campani”, 21-25.<br />

31<br />

Van Helden, “Astronomical telescope”, 20-25. Compare Malet, “Kepler <strong>and</strong> the telescope”, 120.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!