Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 99<br />
extending it to problems the latter had ignored. 207 As with his studies of<br />
dioptrics <strong>and</strong> circular motion, Huygens’ study of consonance did not develop<br />
in an empirical vacuum. He rejected Stevin’s theory, as purely mathematical<br />
<strong>and</strong> ignoring the dem<strong>and</strong>s of sense perception. But he also rejected systems<br />
that lacked theoretical foundation. 208 His aim was to develop a sound<br />
mathematical theory that explained <strong>and</strong> founded his musical preferences.<br />
Mean tone temperament therefore was his natural starting point, <strong>and</strong> the 31tone<br />
division seems a natural outcome of his analysis of its mathematical<br />
properties as it conformed to both his theoretical <strong>and</strong> practical preferences.<br />
Like his studies of circular motion <strong>and</strong> consonance, Huygens’ study of<br />
spherical aberration, <strong>and</strong> this is almost a truism, was predominantly<br />
mathematical. Huygens fruitfully explored <strong>and</strong> rigorously examined<br />
mathematical theory. More revealing in the context of the present study is<br />
the relationship between mathematics <strong>and</strong> observation. Huygens was not<br />
blind for the empirical facts. On the contrary, they constituted the main<br />
directive of his investigation in such diverse ways as the measure of gravity,<br />
pleasing temperament <strong>and</strong> workable lens-shapes. Huygens knew how to<br />
check his theoretical conclusions empirically <strong>and</strong> he was not easily satisfied.<br />
Exploratory observation of phenomena was not the way Huygens<br />
approached a subject. In modern terms: he did not employ experiment<br />
heuristically. In the case of gravity, he had soon found out that mere<br />
observation did not yield reliable knowledge. The result proved him right:<br />
the analysis of the mathematical properties of circular motion gave him a<br />
better theory as well as a better means of measurement. Huygens successfully<br />
extended the Galilean, mathematical approach to gravity <strong>and</strong> circular motion.<br />
Newton likewise was a mathematician with a Galilean spirit, but in his<br />
study of colors he linked it with the experimental approach of Baconianism.<br />
Although he was favorably disposed to Bacon’s program for the organization<br />
of science (see below), Huygens did not regard the experimental collecting of<br />
data as a source for new theories, let alone a trustworthy basis for<br />
mathematical derivation. He explored the underlying mathematical structure<br />
of a phenomenon the results of which could be verified to see whether the<br />
supposed structure was real. In the case of consonance, the empirical<br />
foundation of the theory had already been established. In the case of<br />
spherical aberration, however, such preliminary work had not yet been done,<br />
unfortunately. It turned out that not all effects of lenses depended upon the<br />
known mathematical properties of lenses.<br />
Suppose he had pursued his idea that colors were related to the<br />
inclination of the sides of a lens. He might have taken some objective lenses,<br />
covered their center (instead of their circumference as was customary) <strong>and</strong><br />
207 Cohen, Quantifying music, 209. It should be noted that, unlike his predecessors, Huygens possessed<br />
logarithms <strong>and</strong> was therefore readily able to calculate, for example, a 4 1<br />
5<br />
.<br />
208<br />
Cohen, “Huygens <strong>and</strong> consonance”, 293-294.