27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1655-1672 - DE ABERRATIONE 75<br />

Huygens examined the means to enhance the quality of images produced by<br />

telescopes with a convex ocular. That is, he took a theoretical look at the<br />

matter. On the basis of this analysis, he could provide directions for<br />

optimizing the quality of telescopes with convex oculars.<br />

The magnifying power of a telescope depends upon the ratio of the focal<br />

distances of objective <strong>and</strong> ocular lenses, <strong>and</strong> can therefore be increased by<br />

reducing the focal distance of the ocular lens. This, however, simultaneously<br />

decreases the clarity <strong>and</strong> distinctness of images. To maintain clarity at the<br />

same time, the opening of the objective lens would have to be made larger. 97<br />

He began by considering a naked eye in front of which a telescope is placed.<br />

Assuming that an equal number of rays should enter the eye when a more<br />

powerful telescope is taken, Huygens argued that the opening should be kept<br />

proportional to the magnification. This implied that his 22-foot telescope<br />

would need an opening of 125 times the area of the pupil. In reality, he<br />

observed, a satisfactory telescope had a much smaller opening, only 15 times<br />

the area of the pupil. Evidently, in astronomical observation one could do<br />

with much smaller clarity. He therefore did not take the eye as starting-point,<br />

but a telescope with satisfactory quality. If the ocular is replaced by an ocular<br />

that magnifies twice as much, the clarity will be four times smaller. The<br />

opening of the objective should therefore be increased accordingly.<br />

Evidently, this cannot be done at will <strong>and</strong> one should “consider accurately<br />

which magnification the opening of the exterior lens can support”. 98<br />

Maintaining the clarity of images does not mean,<br />

however, that their quality is maintained. Increasing the<br />

opening of a lens renders images less distinct. Huygens<br />

made it clear that only experience could tell which<br />

configuration produced satisfactory images. Yet, when such<br />

a telescope is known, theory can explain how the quality of<br />

images is maintained when its strength increases. In his<br />

account, Huygens applied a new conception of spherical<br />

aberration that he had defined in an earlier proposition of<br />

De Aberratione. He called it the ‘circle of aberration’. As<br />

contrasted to the earlier conception, in which the aberration<br />

GD is measured along the axis, the circle of aberration is<br />

measured by the distance ED perpendicular to the axis<br />

(Figure 30). In other words, the circle of aberration is the<br />

spot produced by parallel rays coming from one point of a<br />

distant object. Consequently, the images produced by two<br />

lens systems are equally clear <strong>and</strong> equally distinct when the<br />

respective circles of aberration are the same. 99<br />

Figure 30 ‘Circle’<br />

of aberration.<br />

97<br />

OC13, 332-335.<br />

98<br />

OC13, 336-337. “sed diligenter expendendum quale incrementum exterioris lentis apertura perferre<br />

valeat”<br />

99<br />

OC13, 340-343.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!