Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
128 CHAPTER 4<br />
Refraction in La Dioptrique<br />
Descartes began La Dioptrique with an explication of the way rays of light<br />
enter the eye <strong>and</strong> are deflected on their way to it. He did not intend to<br />
explain the true nature of light, he said, as the essay ought to be intelligible to<br />
the common reader. He took the liberty, he said, to employ a threesome of<br />
comparisons between the behavior of light <strong>and</strong> everyday phenomena:<br />
“…; imitating in this the Astronomers, who, although their assumptions are almost all<br />
false or uncertain, nevertheless, because these assumptions refer to different<br />
observations they have made, do not fail to draw many true <strong>and</strong> well-assured<br />
conclusions from them.” 76<br />
First, light acts like the white stick that enables a blind man to sense objects;<br />
it is an action instantaneously propagated through a medium without matter<br />
being transported. Second, this action is like the tendency of a portion of<br />
wine in a barrel of half-pressed grapes to move to a hole in the bottom. It<br />
works along straight lines that can cross each other without hindrance. In<br />
other words, light is not a motion but a tendency to motion:<br />
“And in the same way, considering that it is not so much the movement as the action<br />
of luminous bodies that must be taken for their light, you must judge that the rays of<br />
this light are nothing else but the lines along which this action tends.” 77<br />
Although essentially light is a tendency to movement rather than actual<br />
motion, with respect to the deflections from its straight path rays of light<br />
follow the laws of motion, Descartes maintained. So, in the third<br />
comparison, the way light interacts with mediums of different nature is<br />
compared to the deflections of a moving ball encountering hard or liquid<br />
bodies. Thus the three comparisons of the first discourse of La Dioptrique<br />
established a qualitative basis for the mathematical account of refraction in<br />
the next.<br />
The second discourse ‘Of refraction’ opens with an account of reflection<br />
providing the conceptual basis for Descartes’ explanation of the ‘way in<br />
which refractions ought to be measured’. 78 It introduces a crucial distinction<br />
with regard to the powers governing the motion of an object: one that works<br />
to continue the ball’s motion <strong>and</strong> one that determines the particular direction<br />
in which the ball moves. 79 Instead of the more accurate ‘absolute quantity of<br />
force of motion’ <strong>and</strong> ‘directional quantity of force of motion’, for sake of<br />
convenience I will speak of ‘quantity’ <strong>and</strong> ‘direction’ both of which may<br />
76 Descartes, AT6, 83. “imitant en cecy les Astronomes, qui, bien que leurs suppositions soyent presque<br />
toutes fausses ou incertaines, toutefois, a cause qu’elles se rapportent a diverses observations qu’ils ont<br />
faites, ne laissent pas d’en tirer plusieurs consequences tres vrayes & tres assurées.” (Translation based on<br />
Olscamp)<br />
77 Descartes, AT6, 88. “& ainsy, pensant que ce n’est pas tant le mouvement, comme l’action des cors<br />
lumineus qu’il faut prendre pour leur lumiere, vous devés iuger que les rayons de cete lumiere ne sont<br />
autre chose, que les lignes suivant lesquelles tend cete action.” (Translation based on Olscamp)<br />
78 “… en quelle sorte se doivent mesurer les refractions”, AT6, 101-102.<br />
79 “Seulement faut il remarquer, que la puissance, telle qu’elle soit, qui fait continuer le mouvement de cete<br />
balle, est differente de celle que la determine a se mouvoir plustost vers un costé que vers un autre, …”<br />
AT6, 94.