27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1653 - TRACTATUS 31<br />

incidence; the angle between the incident ray, produced beyond the<br />

refracting surface, <strong>and</strong> the refracted ray.<br />

Kepler began with a discussion<br />

of the focal distances of planoconvex<br />

lenses (Figure 15). A ray<br />

HG is incident on a convex surface<br />

with radius AC, the angle of<br />

incidence is GAC. As the angle of<br />

deviation is one third of this, HG<br />

will be refracted towards F, with AC : AF = 1 : 2. 71 The focal distance is<br />

therefore approximately three times the radius of the convex face.<br />

Analogously, he argued that the focal distance of a plano-convex lens, the<br />

plane face turned towards the incident rays, is approximately twice the radius<br />

of curvature. For other cases Kepler established only rough estimations. If<br />

convergent rays are incident on the plane side of a plano-convex lens, the<br />

refracted rays intersect the axis within the focal distance. Combining these<br />

three theorems, Kepler showed that the focal distance of a bi-convex lens is<br />

both smaller than three times the radius of the anterior side <strong>and</strong> twice the<br />

radius of the posterior side. In the case of an equi-convex lens, this comes<br />

down to a focal distance approximately equal to the radius of its sides. 72<br />

Kepler did not determine the focal distance of a concave lens, he only<br />

showed that rays diverge after refraction. 73<br />

On this basis, the properties of images formed by lenses are easily found.<br />

The image DBF of an extended object CAE through a bi-convex lens GH is<br />

formed at focal distance (Figure 16). The picture is inversed as the rays from<br />

C are refracted towards D, etcetera. As the focal distance is roughly the radius<br />

of any side, the magnitudes of object <strong>and</strong> image will be in a proportion equal<br />

to their respective distances to the lens. 74 In Dioptrice, Kepler briefly reiterated<br />

his theory of vision. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, so he said in the dedication, he did so<br />

for the sake of completeness, on the other h<strong>and</strong> because some readers had<br />

trouble underst<strong>and</strong>ing his account in Paralipomena. 75 He explained that a<br />

perfectly focusing surface was not spherical, but should be hyperbolic, like<br />

the crystalline humor of the eye was. 76 On the basis of his theory of the<br />

retinal image, he explained the effect of a lens placed before the eye once<br />

more. Depending upon the position of the eye with respect to the focal<br />

distance, the object will be perceived sharply. 77 When the eye is placed not<br />

too far from the focus, a magnified image will be perceived.<br />

71 Kepler, Dioptrice, 11 (KGW4, 363).<br />

72 Kepler, Dioptrice, 12-15 (KGW4, 363-367).<br />

73 Kepler, Dioptrice, 45-49 (KGW4, 388-393).<br />

74 Kepler, Dioptrice, 16-18 (KGW4, 367-369).<br />

75 Kepler, Dioptrice, dedication (KGW4, 335).<br />

76 Kepler, Dioptrice, 21-24 (KGW4, 371-372).<br />

77 Kepler, Dioptrice, 35-42 (KGW4, 381-387).<br />

Figure 15 Focal distance of a plano-convex lens

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!