Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1653 - TRACTATUS 31<br />
incidence; the angle between the incident ray, produced beyond the<br />
refracting surface, <strong>and</strong> the refracted ray.<br />
Kepler began with a discussion<br />
of the focal distances of planoconvex<br />
lenses (Figure 15). A ray<br />
HG is incident on a convex surface<br />
with radius AC, the angle of<br />
incidence is GAC. As the angle of<br />
deviation is one third of this, HG<br />
will be refracted towards F, with AC : AF = 1 : 2. 71 The focal distance is<br />
therefore approximately three times the radius of the convex face.<br />
Analogously, he argued that the focal distance of a plano-convex lens, the<br />
plane face turned towards the incident rays, is approximately twice the radius<br />
of curvature. For other cases Kepler established only rough estimations. If<br />
convergent rays are incident on the plane side of a plano-convex lens, the<br />
refracted rays intersect the axis within the focal distance. Combining these<br />
three theorems, Kepler showed that the focal distance of a bi-convex lens is<br />
both smaller than three times the radius of the anterior side <strong>and</strong> twice the<br />
radius of the posterior side. In the case of an equi-convex lens, this comes<br />
down to a focal distance approximately equal to the radius of its sides. 72<br />
Kepler did not determine the focal distance of a concave lens, he only<br />
showed that rays diverge after refraction. 73<br />
On this basis, the properties of images formed by lenses are easily found.<br />
The image DBF of an extended object CAE through a bi-convex lens GH is<br />
formed at focal distance (Figure 16). The picture is inversed as the rays from<br />
C are refracted towards D, etcetera. As the focal distance is roughly the radius<br />
of any side, the magnitudes of object <strong>and</strong> image will be in a proportion equal<br />
to their respective distances to the lens. 74 In Dioptrice, Kepler briefly reiterated<br />
his theory of vision. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, so he said in the dedication, he did so<br />
for the sake of completeness, on the other h<strong>and</strong> because some readers had<br />
trouble underst<strong>and</strong>ing his account in Paralipomena. 75 He explained that a<br />
perfectly focusing surface was not spherical, but should be hyperbolic, like<br />
the crystalline humor of the eye was. 76 On the basis of his theory of the<br />
retinal image, he explained the effect of a lens placed before the eye once<br />
more. Depending upon the position of the eye with respect to the focal<br />
distance, the object will be perceived sharply. 77 When the eye is placed not<br />
too far from the focus, a magnified image will be perceived.<br />
71 Kepler, Dioptrice, 11 (KGW4, 363).<br />
72 Kepler, Dioptrice, 12-15 (KGW4, 363-367).<br />
73 Kepler, Dioptrice, 45-49 (KGW4, 388-393).<br />
74 Kepler, Dioptrice, 16-18 (KGW4, 367-369).<br />
75 Kepler, Dioptrice, dedication (KGW4, 335).<br />
76 Kepler, Dioptrice, 21-24 (KGW4, 371-372).<br />
77 Kepler, Dioptrice, 35-42 (KGW4, 381-387).<br />
Figure 15 Focal distance of a plano-convex lens