Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 CHAPTER 3<br />
supposed light to consist of. 160 In his two successive replies, Newton clarified<br />
his experiments <strong>and</strong> his claims. He fully convinced Pardies of his claims <strong>and</strong><br />
the father ended the discussion by saying that he was ‘very satisfied’. 161<br />
One expects that by now, late July, it must have dawned upon Huygens<br />
what Newton’s new theory was about. Still, the letter he sent Oldenburg on<br />
27 September does not give the impression that he really grasped the essence<br />
of different refrangibility. 162 He regarded Newton’s replies as a further<br />
confirmation of the theory, but added that things could still be otherwise. It<br />
had, however, dawned upon him that Newton had also something to say<br />
about the nature of light, to wit the compound nature of white light. To this<br />
he raised objections of a different kind:<br />
“Besides, if it were true that the rays of light were, from their origin, some red, some<br />
blue etc., there would still remain the great difficulty of explaining by the physics,<br />
mechanics wherein this diversity of colors consists.” 163<br />
The remark was clearly inspired by the objections Pardies had made. It does<br />
not give the impression that Huygens had given the matter any further<br />
thought. Let it be noted that this was the first moment Huygens raised<br />
objections of a mechanistic nature against Newton, after their discussion had<br />
progressed in several letters, <strong>and</strong> that the objections are not brought out<br />
strongly. He still did not refer to the notion of different refrangibility. As a<br />
conclusion he admitted his misreading of Newton’s discussion of chromatic<br />
aberration.<br />
Huygens’ next letter to Oldenburg, four months later on 14 January 1673,<br />
displayed a drastic change in his attitude towards Newton’s theory. Not only<br />
did he show to have considered the claims about the nature of white light<br />
<strong>and</strong> colors, he also subjected them to a serious critique. 164 In addition, the<br />
tone of his comments became sharper. In his view Newton unnecessarily<br />
complicated matters:<br />
“I also do not see why Monsieur Newton does not content himself with the two colors<br />
yellow <strong>and</strong> blue, because it will be much easier to find some hypothesis by motion that<br />
explains these two differences, than for so many diversities as there are of other colors.<br />
And until he has found this hypothesis he will not have taught us wherein the nature<br />
<strong>and</strong> diversity of colors consists but only this accident (which certainly is very<br />
considerable) of their different refrangibility.” 165<br />
160<br />
Newton, Correspondence 1, 157.<br />
161<br />
Newton, Correspondence 1, 205. “Je suis tres satisfait de la derniere réponse que M. Newton a bien voulu<br />
faire à mes instances.”<br />
162<br />
Sabra, Theories of Light, 270.<br />
163<br />
OC7, 228-229. “De plus qu<strong>and</strong> il seroyt vray que les rayons de lumiere, des leur origine, fussent les uns<br />
rouges, les autres bleus &c. il resteroit encor la gr<strong>and</strong>e difficultè d’expliquer par la physique, mechanique<br />
en quoy consiste cette diversitè de couleurs.”<br />
164<br />
OC7, 242-244.<br />
165<br />
OC7, 243. “Je ne vois pas aussi pourquoy Monsieur Newton ne se contente pas des 2 couleurs jaune et<br />
bleu, car il sera bien plus aisè de trouver quelque hypothese par le mouvement qui explique ces deux<br />
differences que non pas pour tant de diversitez qu’il y a d’autres couleurs. Et jusqu’a ce qu’il ait trouvè<br />
cette hypothese il ne nous aura pas appris en quoy consiste la nature et difference des couleurs mais<br />
seulement cet accident (qui assurement est fort considerable) de leur differente refrangibilitè.”