Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Lenses and Waves
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130 CHAPTER 4<br />
Therefore the distance between lines FE <strong>and</strong> HB must be twice a large as that<br />
between AC <strong>and</strong> HB. As a result, the ball reaches point I on the circle. The<br />
same is the case when instead of a cloth the ball hits the surface of a body of<br />
water. For the water does not alter the motion of the ball any further after it<br />
has passed the surface, according to Descartes. When the ball passes a<br />
boundary where in some way or another its quantity of motion is augmented,<br />
it reaches the circumference of the circle earlier <strong>and</strong> is deflected towards the<br />
normal of the surface. Note that Descartes did not specify the change of the<br />
perpendicular component, a point that is often overlooked. He did not know<br />
that amount <strong>and</strong> he did not need to, for the two assumptions he used suffice<br />
for the derivation of the sine law. 81<br />
As Descartes took the motions of the ball to reflect the deflections of<br />
light, he could now draw his main conclusion. Rays of light are deflected in<br />
exact proportion to the ease with which a transparent medium receives them<br />
compared to the medium from which they come. The only remaining<br />
difference between the motion of a ball <strong>and</strong> the action of light is that a<br />
denser medium like water allows rays of light to pass more easily. The<br />
deflection caused by the passage from one medium into another ought to be<br />
measured, not by the angles made with the refracting surface, but by the lines<br />
CB <strong>and</strong> BE. Unlike the proportion between the angles of incidence <strong>and</strong><br />
refraction, the proportion between these sines remains the same for any<br />
refraction caused by a pair of mediums, irrespective of the angle of<br />
incidence. Et voilà, the law of sines.<br />
Epistemic aspects of Descartes’ account in historical context<br />
Both historically <strong>and</strong> intrinsically, Descartes’ account of refraction is a key<br />
text in the transition from medieval perspectiva to seventeenth-century<br />
optics. Yet, the line of inference is subtle <strong>and</strong>, at many points, implicitly<br />
pursued. I will have to enlarge in some detail on its epistemic aspects in their<br />
historical context.<br />
At least three levels of inference can be distinguished in Descartes’<br />
account. In the first place the level of mathematics. This holds the derivation<br />
of the sine law from the two assumptions conveyed in the diagrams<br />
accompanying his discourse. First, the passage to another medium alters in a<br />
fixed ratio the quantity of motion. This ratio is represented by the radius of<br />
the circle. Second, the parallel component of the direction of motion is<br />
unaffected. This is represented by drawing horizontal lines in proportion to<br />
the successive times to travel to <strong>and</strong> from the center of the circle. The<br />
mathematical inference of Descartes’ account constituted a successful<br />
culmination of perspectivist optics, in that Descartes was the first to derive a<br />
law of refraction on the analytical groundwork laid by Kepler <strong>and</strong> his<br />
forebears. He brought consistency to the analysis of reflection <strong>and</strong> refraction<br />
by having the parallel component constant in all cases. More important, in<br />
81 When both aspects of the motion are interpreted as speeds the assumptions can be written as: vr = nvi<br />
<strong>and</strong> vi sini = vr sinr, which directly yield sini = n sinr. See Sabra, Theories of Light, 111.