27.06.2013 Views

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

Lenses and Waves

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 CHAPTER 2<br />

century student of burning glasses Ibn Sahl had used a rule equivalent to the<br />

sine law. 90 Around 1620, the Leiden professor of mathematics Willebrord<br />

Snel was next <strong>and</strong> in the late 1620s Descartes closed the ranks of discoverers<br />

of the law of refraction. 91 He published it in La Dioptrique (1637), shortly after<br />

Pierre Hérigone had done so in the fifth volume of Cursus Mathematicus.<br />

Hérigone did not use it in his dioptrical account, which summarized Dioptrice.<br />

Harriot <strong>and</strong> Snel have left no trace of applying their find to lenses. Which<br />

leaves La Dioptrique for further inspection.<br />

Descartes <strong>and</strong> the ideal telescope<br />

La Dioptrique was the fruit of Descartes’ involvement in the activities of<br />

Parisian savants regarding (non-spherical) mirrors <strong>and</strong> lenses, which also<br />

places him in the sixteenth-century tradition of mirror-making. 92 Descartes,<br />

however, added his natural philosophical leanings <strong>and</strong> Kepler’s optical<br />

teachings. In collaboration with the mathematician Mydorge <strong>and</strong> the artisan<br />

Ferrier, he allegedly managed to produce a hyperbolic lens <strong>and</strong> in the course<br />

of events he discovered the law of refraction. La Dioptrique had much<br />

influence on seventeenth-century optics, especially through its second<br />

discourse where Descartes derived the sine law. 93 In the following discourses,<br />

Descartes first discussed the eye <strong>and</strong> vision – summarizing Kepler’s theory<br />

of the retinal image – <strong>and</strong> then went on to a consideration “Of the means of<br />

perfecting vision”. 94 This seventh discourse anticipated his discussion of<br />

telescopes. He laid stress on the way spectacles enhance vision, instead of<br />

correcting it. The telescope itself was introduced in a peculiar way. Descartes<br />

explained how an elongated lens may further enhance vision. He then<br />

replaced the solid middle part by air, thus arriving at a telescope consisting of<br />

two lenses. 95 The argument was clear, but the discussion of focal <strong>and</strong><br />

magnifying properties of lenses was entirely qualitative <strong>and</strong> the sine law<br />

played no role in it.<br />

In the eighth discourse of La Dioptrique, Descartes applied the sine law to<br />

lenses under the title: “Of the figures transparent bodies must have to divert<br />

the rays by refraction in all manners that serve vision”. 96 Its sole purpose was<br />

to show that lenses ought to have an elliptic or hyperbolic surface in order to<br />

bring rays to a perfect focus. Avoiding the subtleties of geometry he<br />

explained how these lines could be drawn by practical means <strong>and</strong><br />

demonstrated the relevant properties of the ellipse <strong>and</strong> hyperbola. As regards<br />

the focal distances of lenses thus obtained with respect to configuration <strong>and</strong><br />

90<br />

Rashed, “Pioneer”, 478-486.<br />

91<br />

For Snel see: Hentschel, “Brechungsgesetz”. It is possible that Wilhelm Boelmans in Louvain somewhat<br />

later discovered the sine law independently. Ziggelaar, “The sine law of refraction”, 250.<br />

92<br />

Gaukroger, Descartes, 138-146. Dupré, Galileo, the Telescope, 53-54.<br />

93<br />

Discussed in section 4.1.3<br />

94<br />

Descartes, AT6, 147. “Des moyens de perfectionner la vision. Discours septiesme.”<br />

95<br />

Descartes, AT6, 155-160.<br />

96<br />

Descartes, AT6, 165. “Des figures que doivent avoir les corps transparens pour detourner les rayons par<br />

refraction en toutes les façons qui servent a la veuë”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!