27.07.2013 Views

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NSfK’s 40. forskerseminar, Espoo, Finland 1998<br />

Thus, a complex evaluation of the data about the status of hooliganism crimes in the Baltic<br />

states suggests, that the volume and rates of growth of hooliganism crimes are the greatest in<br />

Lithuania, followed by Estonia, and then Latvia.<br />

Indicators of the spreading of theft, one more traditional type of crime, are presented in table<br />

4.<br />

Table 4. Thefts in the Baltic States during 1992-1996<br />

Year<br />

Registered thefts<br />

Lithuania Latvia Estonia<br />

total as a percent total as a percent total as a percent<br />

number of all crimes number of all crimes number of all crimes<br />

1992 42 708 75,4 48 190 77,9 33 309 80,7<br />

1993 43 375 71,8 39 356 74,5 27 339 73,6<br />

1994 40 252 68,6 27 211 66,4 24 719 69,2<br />

1995 41 619 68,4 24 628 63,0 28 165 71,2<br />

1996 44 600 65,5 23 368 61,2 24 764 69,9<br />

Thefts made up the greatest part of criminality in general in the Baltic states in 1992 (75,4%<br />

in Lithuania, 77,9% in in Latvia, 80,7% in Estonia). The smallest proportion of thefts was in<br />

1996 (65,5% in Lithuania, 61,2% in Latvia, 69,9% in Estonia). As we see, in Lithuania and<br />

Estonia theft as a proportion of all crime decreased during the five years by approximately 10<br />

per cent, and in Latvia by 16,7 per cent.<br />

Thus, thefts constantly make up the greatest part of registered criminality in the Baltic states:<br />

in 1992 in Lithuania - 3/4 in Latvia - more than 3/4 and in Estonia - 4/5; in 1996 in Lithuania<br />

- 2/3, in Latvia - less than 2/3, in Estonia - more than 2/3.<br />

In general, theft as a proportion of all crimes and its dynamics during 1992-1996 was similar<br />

in all of the Baltic countries.<br />

But by total numbers of thefts and their dynamics the Baltic states differ very much. During<br />

the above mentioned period, the greatest number of thefts was registered in Lithuania in 1996,<br />

where there were 1892 crimes more than in 1992 but only 1225 more crimes than in 1993. So,<br />

the number of thefts in Lithuania during the period mentioned above has not increased much<br />

(by 4,4 per cent).<br />

In Latvia during 1992-1996 the greatest number of thefts was registered in 1992 and the<br />

smallest in 1996 (a difference of 24822 crimes, or 51,5% smaller).<br />

In Estonia during 1992-1996 the greatest number of registered thefts was in 1992; smallest in<br />

1994 and 1996 (accordingly by 8590 crimes or 25,8 per cent and 8545 crimes or 25,6 per cent<br />

smaller).<br />

This analysis shows that the most unfavourable situation and dynamics of thefts during the<br />

1992-1996 period among Baltic states was in Lithuania: the total number did not increase<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!